•  Background
•  Historical Memory
•  I Encuentro
•  II Encuentro
•  III Encuentro
•  Encuentro 2000
•  Statistics
•  Data on Hispanic Arch/Dioceses
•  Form
•  English Liturgy
•  Spanish Liturgy
•  Music English & Spanish
•  Hispanic and AIDS
•  Commoration Letter
•  Prayer Card •  SECCAM
•  Manual-Youth Encuentro
•  National Symposium
•  Best Practices
•  AIDS/HIV
•  Conferences
•  Immigration
•  WYD
•  MACC
•  SEPI
•  Instituto Fe y Vida
•  NCAN
•  NCCHM
•  NCADDHM
•  La Red
•  Manual-Youth Encuentro
•  ANSH
•  Deacons
•  CARA
•  FIP
•  SECCAM
•  Best Practices
•  Catalog (in English)
•  Education Symposium
•  Encuentro & Mission
•  Hispanic Ministry Study
•  Living the Present
•  Looking Forward
•  Multicultural
•  National Pastoral Plan
•  Parish Guide
•  Vocations/English
•  Vocations/Spanish
•  Study on Best Practices
•  Registered Nine Steps
•  Ecclesiological Framework
•  Article on Marriage
•  Vocations/English
•  Vocations/Spanish
Guide to Encuentro and Mission Document:
•  Remembering the Past
•  Living the Present
•  Looking Forward

Faithful Citizenship:
A Matter of Conscience Calling all Catholic adults! Form your conscience! Watch this brief video to learn how Catholic values can shape your conscience and help you make sound public choices (English, 10 minutes)



Spanish Adaptation
coming soon





Hispanic Ministry at the Turn of the New Millennium

A Report of the
Bishops' Committee on Hispanic Affairs
Most Reverend Gerald R. Barnes, Chairman

National Conference of Catholic Bishops
November 1999


Table of Content




Acknowledgements

Hispanic Ministry at the Turn of the New Millennium is the summary report of two research projects commissioned by the Bishops' Committee on Hispanic Affairs in the name of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Part I of the report consists of data obtained from a national survey of diocesan bishops. Part II consists of data collected from a survey done of diocesan directors for Hispanic ministry. Both parts I and II of the report were conducted and written by Stewart Lawrence of Puentes, Inc. Funding for these two parts of the report came from the Catholic Bishops of the United States. Part III of the report consists of information obtained from on-site interviews with some of the bishops in the dioceses visited, clergy and religious, diocesan staff members, and lay leaders from eight dioceses in different parts of the country. The on-site interviews were conducted by Rev. Raϊl Gomez and Dr. Manuel Vαsquez, in conjunction with the Life Cycle Institute of the Catholic University of America. Funding for the on-site interviews was provided by the Louisville Foundation.




Preface

Data collection and pastoral planning among Hispanic Catholics in the United States have traditionally taken place through a process known as encuentro. Consultation is an integral part of encuentro. It is a unique process in that the historic memory and gifts of each participant are respected and integrated into a prayerful and action oriented two-year process that involves tens of thousands of Church leaders from throughout the country. Encuentro promotes evangelization and the mission of the Church. Pastoral priorities established by the delegates, under the leadership of the U.S. Bishops, are then implemented by Church leaders in the parishes, dioceses, regional offices, national ministry offices, and Catholic organizations.

In commissioning this national study of diocesan bishops and Hispanic ministry directors, the Committee on Hispanic Affairs saw the need to continue to collect data on the U.S. Hispanic Catholic presence. Given that the process for Encuentro 2000 is multicultural in nature and catechetically based, the traditional form of consultation did not take place. As a result, the Bishops' Committee determined that a national study would be imperative to getting information that might further Hispanic ministry efforts in the United States. With Funding from the U.S. Bishops, the Committee on Hispanic Affairs contracted with the Life Cycle Institute of the Catholic University of America to help gather the data.

The data shared in this report consists of three parts. The first part of the study is of U.S. Bishops who responded to a series of questions about their perception of pastoral ministry among Hispanic Catholics. The second part is of coordinators and diocesan directors of Hispanic ministry from 150 dioceses. The third part of the study, which was done independently and funded by the Louisville Foundation, consists of information obtained from interviews in eight different dioceses. The participating dioceses were located in different parts of the country and involved different nationalities of the Hispanic Catholic community. Clergy, religious, lay leaders, and parish and diocesan personnel participated in the interviews. Additional information on the Hispanic population growth by diocese is included in Appendix B.

The Hispanic Presence at the Turn of the New Millennium is a report that can be used by bishops and diocesan staff for pastoral planning. As the Hispanic Catholic population continues to grow, and as the many faces of the Church become more apparent, there will be many challenges to respond to in building the one body of Christ. Much has been done in Hispanic ministry, but there is still much more to be done. The challenge in the next several years will be to respond to the Hispanic presence in context of a multicultural Church.

It is the hope and expectation of the Bishops' Committee on Hispanic Affairs that the information in this report will be helpful and useful as the Church strives to assure all of God's people are invited to the Father's table.




The Hispanic Presence at a Glance

Total Population of US Hispanics:

Percent of US Population:

Percent of US Population Under 25:

Hispanic Percent of US Population in 2010:

Black Percent of US Population in 2010:

Percent of Hispanic Population, Native Born (1980):

Percent of Hispanic Population, Native Born (1990):

Percent of Catholic Growth Since 1960 (Due to Hispanics):

Percent of Catholics Who are Hispanic:

Percent of Hispanics Who are Catholic (1994):


Percent of Hispanics Who are Catholic (1998):


Number of Parishes With Hispanic Ministry:

Percent of Parishes With Hispanic Ministry:

Number of Hispanic Priests:

Percent of Hispanic Priests in the US:

Catholics per US Priest:

Hispanic Catholics per US Priest:

Number of Hispanic Seminarians:

Hispanic Percent of U S Seminarians:

30 million

11.3 %

14 %

13.8 %

12.6 %

80 %

64 %

71%

30-38 %

71 % (low)
77 % (high)

67 % (low)
71 % (high)

3,617

17.9 %

2,005

3.8 %

1,230

9,925

511

11.1 %




Bishops Survey

Overview of Bishops Survey

  1. The Questionnaire

    The questionnaire for bishops contained 11 questions. The first 4 questions asked the bishop if he was satisfied with the performance of Hispanic ministry in his diocese, whether the ministry's programs were, in general, effective, and which areas of ministry he believed had been the most and least successful. Two questions asked the bishop to describe the gifts and contributions of Hispanics to the larger church and to assess, in his view, whether other Catholics understood and appreciated these gifts. A separate list of questions established a checklist of potential challenges in Hispanic attitudes as well as shortfalls in diocesan resources. Other questions focused on the role of popular religiosity and the lay apostolic movements, and the bishops' ideas for increasing the visibility and leadership of Hispanics in his diocese.

  2. Overview of Results

    The responses indicated a generally high degree of satisfaction with the current development of Hispanic ministry, coupled with a recognition that much more could and should be done. The bishops ranked faith formation among Hispanics as the number one priority for the future. Second on their list was continued outreach to Hispanic immigrants, primarily through parish-based renewal and Catholic radio and television programs.
    The following is a question-by-question breakdown of the responses to the bishops survey. As indicated, the bishops' responses to several survey questions varied sharply by episcopal region. These important regional differences should be kept in mind when assessing the general results.

    Question 1: Is Hispanic ministry meeting your personal expectations?

    Yes
    63.7%
    No 26.5%
    No Answer 9.7%

    Variation:

    Regions 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, 11 and 13 answered yes by an overwhelming margin.

    Regions 7, 8 and 12, on average, answered no.

    Responses from regions 5 and 9 were mixed.


    Question 2: How would you rate the effectiveness of Hispanic ministry?

    Very Effective
    10.6%
    Effective 67.3%
    Not effective (yet) 22.1%

    Variation:

    Regions 2, 3, 6, 10, 11 and 13 tended to answer effective or very effective.

    Regions 1, 4, 5, 8, 9 and 12 were more evenly divided between effective and not effective.

    Region 7 tended to answer not effective.


    Question 3: Please rank order the areas of Hispanic ministry that are most in need of improvement in your diocese.

    (Ranked No. 1)

    Formation programs for Hispanic laity
    38.1%
    Pastoral outreach to Hispanic immigrants 28.3%
    Sacramental preparation in Spanish 11.5%
    English language training for Hispanics 10.6%
    More social services to Hispanics 10.6%
    Other 0.9%

    Variation:

    Formation was ranked the top program priority in 8 of the 13 regions (2,3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 13)

    The five exceptions were regions 1, 4, 7, 9 and 11; in these regions, formation or pastoral outreach was ranked first.

    Only 29 bishops (25.7%) in the entire survey ranked formation as less than first or second in importance.

    Sacramental preparation was most frequently ranked second in importance in regions 4, 7, 8 and 9.

    English language preparation ranked as a higher priority in region I I than elsewhere.


    Question 4: Which aspects of Hispanic ministry do you feel have been most successful?

    Pastoral outreach, including more
    Spanish masses

    42.5%
    Formation of lay leaders 28.3%
    Social services 20.4%
    Liturgical celebrations 20.4%
    More Hispanics in leadership positions 12.4%
    Youth programs 7.1%

    Variation:

    Region 5 and (especially) region11 were the most likely to list "pastoral outreach" as an area of success.

    Regions 6 and 10 were the least likely to list this area.

    Regions 1 and 2 were most likely to identify "social services" as an area of success.

    Regions 2 and (especially) 10 were the most likely to list "lay leadership formation" as a success. Regions 3, 4, 6 and 11 were somewhat less likely to do so. Regions 7, 8 and 9 were highly unlikely to list this area.

    Region 10 was the most likely to list "more Hispanics in leadership positions" as a success area.


    Question 5: What are the most important gifts and contributions that Hispanic Catholics bring to your diocese?

    Family strength and values
    59.3%
    Strong faith 47.8%
    Ethnic traditions and customs 35.4%
    Love of celebration 31.0%
    Popular religiosity 17.7%
    Community spirit 13.3%

    Variation:

    A majority of the bishops in 8 regions listed "family strength and values" as an important gift of Hispanics to the church. The 8 regions were 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10 and 11.

    Only 3 regions (5, 8 and 11) were likely to identify "strong faith" as another one of these gifts. Less than 50% of the bishops in the other regions listed this trait.

    Region 10 was the most likely to list ethnic traditions and customs and love of celebration as Hispanic gifts to the church.

    Most of the bishops who identified popular religiosity as a gift are based in regions 3 and 11. However, the vast majority of bishops in each region did not identify popular religiosity as a gift.


    Question 6: Which of the following descriptions apply to your diocese?

    1. Most Hispanics have need of solid catechetical formation

      True 70.0%
      False 30.0%

    2. Hispanics do not contribute their fair share to the parishes which serve them.

      True 32.7%
      False 67.3%

    3. We need more Spanish language masses and other Spanish programs.

      True 56.6%
      False 43.4%

    4. We have a shortage of Spanish-speaking priests, sisters and deacons.

      True 74.3%
      False 25.7%

    5. Hispanics are highly susceptible to evangelization by non Catholics.

      True 69.0%
      False 31.0%

    6. Hispanics often do not feel welcome in their parishes.

      True 36.3%
      False 63.7%

    7. Most non-Hispanic priests in my diocese are not prepared to work effectively with Hispanics

      True 62.8%
      False 37.2%
    Variation:

    Most bishops in most regions say that Hispanics need more solid catechetical formation. However, most of the bishops in region 3 disagree.

    Most of the bishops in 10 regions feel Hispanics contribute their fair share to the parishes. However, most bishops in regions 2, 10 and 12 disagree.

    There is a wide diversity of opinion on the need for more Spanish masses and programs. Regions 4, 5, 8, 9, 10 and 13 overwhelmingly say yes, regions 1, 3, 6 and 12 overwhelmingly say no. Regions 7 and 11 are more mixed in their views.

    All regions say they need more Spanish-speaking priests, though this is less the case in regions 3 and 9.

    Nearly all of the bishops in regions 5, 10, 11 and 13 say that Hispanics are susceptible to evangelization by non-Catholics.
    Bishops in regions 2, 3, 4 and 6 are somewhat less likely to say this. Bishops in regions 1 and 12 disagree with this statement.

    Region 3 is the only region where most of the bishops believe that non Hispanic priests are ready to work with Hispanics.


    Question 7: Are "popular" religious expressions, such as home altars, devotion to the saints and street processions, an important part of being Catholic in the United States?

    Yes 54.9%
    No 27.4%
    Not sure 17.7%

    Variation:

    Regions 1, 2 , 10, 11 and 13 overwhelmingly say yes. Opinion is highly mixed in the other regions, but regions 5 and 12 generally say no. Those who are unsure predominate in regions 3 and 7.


    Question 8: Some priests and laity complain that Hispanic apostolic movements function too independently from local parishes. Do you feel that this is a problem in your diocese?

    Yes 12.4%
    No 73.5%
    Not sure 14.2%

    Variation:

    This distribution is consistent across all regions

    A total of 14 bishops believe that the apostolic movements are too independent. Most of these bishops oversee large dioceses with large numbers of Hispanics and have a long history of Hispanic ministry. Five of these dioceses are in the West and Southwest.


    Question 9: Which of the following programs should be expanded to foster the practice of faith among Hispanic Catholics?

    1. Catholic radio and television programs (bilingual).

      Yes 60.2%
      No 39.8%

    2. Priest home visits

      Yes 51.3%
      No 48.7%

    3. Neighborhood "base" communities

      Yes 53.1%
      No 46.9%

    4. Bilingual masses in public squares and stadiums

      Yes 13.3%
      No 86.7%

    5. Religious processions through local neighborhoods

      Yes 15.0%
      No 85%

    6. Parish "renewal" programs
      Yes 61.9%
      No 38.1%

    7. Ethnic "sensitivity" training for non-Hispanics

      Yes 59.3%
      No 40.7%
    Variation:

    Regions 6 and 9 were not receptive to expanded media programs, and region 3 had mixed opinions. All of the others expressed support.

    Regions 5, 11 and 12 were opposed to priest home visits. Most other regions had mixed opinions.

    Regions 4, 10 and 11 were overwhelmingly in support of promoting Hispanic base communities; regions 5, 6, 7, and 9 were also generally supportive. However, regions I and 2 were opposed and opinions in region 3, 8 and 12 were mixed.

    More public masses and religious processions appealed primarily to region 1.

    Regions 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 were most in favor of parish "renewal" programs. Regions 2, 3 and 8 were least in favor of these programs. Opinions in regions 4 and 5 were mixed, but on balance these regions were also in favor.

    Ethnic sensitivity programs were strongly endorsed by regions 7,8, 9, 12 and 13. Regions 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, and 11 had mixed opinions but a slim majority in 2, 4, 10 and 11 were in favor. Only region I was opposed to such programs.


    Question 10. What should be done to enable Hispanic priests and laity to assume more visible leadership roles in your diocese?

    Trained Hispanics need to make themselves more available
    13.8%
    Invite more Hispanics to serve 20.4%
    Appoint Hispanics to councils 17.7%
    Expand training and education programs 25.7%

    Variation:

    Bishops in regions 4 and 11 were more likely to support expanded training and education programs. Bishops in region 5 were more likely to view the issue as a question of utilizing existing talent.

    The most striking result is the low percentage of bishops who offered an opinion on this issue.


    Question 11: How well do other Catholics understand the needs, contributions and gifts of Hispanic Catholics in your diocese?

    Very well 0.9%
    Somewhat well 40.7%
    Not very well 58.4%

    Variation:

    Bishops in regions with higher numbers of native-born Hispanics (8, 10, 11, 12 and 13) tended to say that other Catholics understood Hispanics "somewhat well."

    By contrast, a strong majority of the bishops in regions 2, 3, 5, 7 and 9 answered "not very well." Results for regions 1, 4, and 6 were mixed.




    Diocesan Directors Survey

    Overview of Findings

    Hispanic Ministry Offices

    The good news ..

    • 44 Hispanic ministry offices have been created or upgraded in the past nine years. Most of the new offices have their own budgets and have access to the bishop directly or indirectly through an episcopal vicar or through another high official in the chancery.

    • Hispanic ministry budgets have increased in over 80% of the dioceses with a history of Hispanic ministry. The total funds expended on Hispanic Ministry in 1998 surpassed $10 million, with an average budget of about $125,000 per diocese. Between 1990 and 1998, the rate of increase in the Hispanic Ministry budget was higher than the rate of increase in the total diocesan budget in nearly 60% of the dioceses.

    • Hispanic ministry staffs have nearly doubled since 1990. The average full-time staff has grown from 1.7 persons per diocesan office in 1990 to 2.6 persons per diocesan office in 1998. The average part-time staff has grown from 0.2 persons per diocesan office to 0.8 persons per diocesan office. In addition, the number of regular volunteer staff per office has more than tripled during this period.

    • Hispanic ministry directors are more educated and professional than ever before. 60% of the directors have earned at least one master's degree, 25% have attained a bachelor's degree, and 8% have a doctorate. Most directors are foreignborn Hispanics, but nearly all are fully bilingual. A director's average term in office is between 5 and 6 years.

    • About 55% of the Hispanic ministry directors say their diocese is providing "a lot" of support for their work. Currently, over 25% of the directors are focused on obtaining more Hispanic priests and religious; 20% are seeking to establish leadership formation institutes and other formation programs for Hispanics; 14% are attempting to strengthen parish-based organization.
    The challenges ...

    • Ten or more Hispanic ministry departments or offices have been dismantled or downgraded since 1990. These include offices in dioceses with large numbers of Hispanics and a long history of Hispanic Ministry. In addition, several dioceses have been without a Hispanic Ministry coordinator for over a year and in some cases, over two years, and at least two dioceses have yet to establish an office despite the fact that their Hispanic populations are among the fastest-growing in the country.

    • Most Hispanic ministry offices remain subsumed under another diocesan department and are supervised by that department's director. This arrangement generally lin-fits the visibility and access of Hispanic ministry in the diocese. The most frequent departmental "home" for Hispanic ministry is the Office of Pastoral Services or the diocesan Pastoral Center (28.3%). The next most frequent sites are Catholic Charities (15.2%) and Multi-Cultural Services (13.0%).

    Diocesan Structures

    The good news ...

    • A growing number of dioceses have created new structures for Hispanic ministry at the regional or deanery level. Some of these dioceses have also hired Hispanic staff in other departments to work closely with Hispanic ministry in a "pastoral de conjunto." About 28% of the dioceses have two or more departments with at least one staff person assigned permanently to Hispanic ministry. About 18% of the dioceses have three or more offices with staff persons so assigned.
    The challenges ...

    • Collaboration between Hispanic ministry and other diocesan departments tends to be limited in duration. In the vast majority of dioceses, this collaboration occurs on a project basis, if at all. The only two offices that maintain a consistent or ongoing relationship with Hispanic ministry are the Office of Religious Education (primarily for sacramental preparation) and Catholic Charities. About 50% of the diocesan directors for Hispanic ministry report having no ongoing relationship with the diocesan offices for pastoral planning, evangelization, family life, liturgy, adult education, and pastoral care to migrants and refugees. Project-based collaboration occurs in about a third of these cases.

    • Most dioceses do not conduct pastoral planning for Hispanics on a consistent or regular basis. Although 70% of the dioceses reported having adopted a pastoral plan for Hispanics as of 1990, only 45% meet at least yearly to review and revise the plan's implementation. About 27% of the dioceses with a history of Hispanic ministry do conduct pastoral planning for Hispanics on a regular basis; however, another 28% have never conducted such planning.

    Parish Structures

    The good news ...

    • Hispanic ministry's "presence" at the parish level has grown by almost 50%. In 1990, Hispanic ministry was present, on average, in 18 territorial parishes and 0.66 national parishes per diocese. In 1998, Hispanic ministry is present in 26 territorial parishes and 0.77 national parishes per diocese.

    • The recognition of Hispanics as a "presence" in local parishes has increased. About 18% of all Catholic parishes have a significant Hispanic presence. Of these parishes, 25% are "integrated" parishes, with Hispanics and other Catholics jointly administering parish life. In addition, 50% of these parishes offer religious education to children in Spanish, and about 37% offer religious education to adults in Spanish.
    The challenges ...

    • Most Hispanics continue to worship in "mixed" or "parallel" parish settings. These settings allow Hispanics to maintain their own identity and culture, but the administration and life of the parish is divided into separate, and at times, highly unequal spheres. Most Hispanics attend their own masses in Spanish, usually at non peak times, and not always in the main church sanctuary. In addition, Hispanics rarely have the same level of representation on the parish pastoral council as non Hispanics, and frequently rely on volunteers to manage their own parish programs.

    • Most Hispanics are not receiving culturally sensitive programs in their parishes. Less than a third of the parishes with a significant Hispanic presence offer youth ministry, RCIA, lay leadership training, parish renewal, or (Cursillo) retreat programs in Spanish. Only 13% are developing Christian "base" communities for evangelization and outreach to Hispanics. In addition, about 21 % of all Hispanic oriented parishes offer no Hispanic programs aside from the liturgy and mass in Spanish.

    Programs for Priests and Seminarians

    The good news ...

    • Language and cultural training for priest candidates has increased in recent years. In 1990, only 18% of the dioceses offered "English as a Second Language" programs to Hispanic seminarians; in addition, only 31% required their non-Hispanic seminarians to study Spanish. By 1998, the number of dioceses offering ESL to Hispanics had doubled, and the number requiring non-Hispanics to study Spanish had increased by 67%.
    The challenges ...

    • The number of new Hispanic vocations remains low. The growing pool of male Hispanic newcomers is a potential source of new energy for the priesthood. However, education, language and cultural barriers continue to limit their entry into seminary. Among the native-born, new opportunities for social advancement outside the Church, coupled with a lack of active recruitment in the parishes, has led to a decline in Hispanic vocations to the priesthood. In the Northeast alone, the number of Hispanic seminarians has declined 64% since 1983.

    • Continuing education in Hispanic ministry for non-Hispanic priests and sisters is on the decline. In 1998, far fewer U.S. religious are taking courses in Spanish or studying Hispanic faith culture. For example, in 1990, 9% of priests and about 6% of sisters nationwide were studying Spanish; in 1998, the combined figure for all religious was under 4%. The percentage of U.S. religious engaged in studies of Hispanic devotions and sacramental life has declined by well over 50%.

    Lay Participation and Leadership

    The good news ...

    • Hispanics already active in the church have increased their levels of participation. 70% of the diocesan directors report that Hispanic men are more active in their parishes than in 1990. Much of the credit is due to the expansion of the lay apostolic groups, particularly the Cursillo and the Charismatic Renewal. 77% of the directors also report that Hispanic women are in higher positions of diocesan and parish leadership than in 1990.

    • 43% of the dioceses administer a separate lay leadership institute or lay leadership program for Hispanics. Most of these new programs focus on the formation of leaders for parish ministry, though a few offer opportunities for advanced training and education. Some, and perhaps most, were established with assistance from regional training centers such as the Southeast Pastoral Institute, the Mexican-American Cultural Center, and Northeast Institute for Pastoral Formation, as well as smaller institutes such as Kino and Tepeyac.
    The challenges ...

    • The level of Hispanic leadership in the dioceses remains low. 63% of the diocesan directors said their diocese was "not doing enough" to encourage Hispanics to become leaders; however, 60% also acknowledged that most Hispanics still lacked the leadership skills and experience to serve in diocesan administration. 63% of the dioceses with Hispanic ministry have no Hispanics in management positions in the central offices and 73% have no Hispanics in the management of Catholic Charities.

    • Hispanic programs are most effective with Hispanic adults who speak Spanish. Only 18% of the diocesan directors said their diocese was not effectively reaching Spanish-speaking adults. However, 37% of the dioceses are not reaching Spanish speaking youth; 43 % are not reaching English-speaking Hispanic adults; and 5 1 % are not reaching English-speaking Hispanic youth.

    Evangelization and Outreach

    The good news ...

    • Small faith communities of various kinds are proliferating among Hispanics. The most popular by far is the charismatic renewal, followed by the Cursillo, the Movimiento Familiar Cristiano and the Talleres de Oraciσn. Charismatic Renewal is active in 36% of the parishes with a significant Hispanic presence. Cursillo is active in 31 %, and Talleres de Oraciσn in 17%. Conflicts between the dioceses and the leadership of these groups have generally been resolved or muted in recent years.

    • A growing number of dioceses are supporting Catholic media programs in Spanish. While support for Catholic television programming in Spanish has declined in most dioceses (due to cost), support for radio and print media in Spanish has increased. About 40% of the dioceses publish diocesan newspapers, newsletters or newspaper inserts in Spanish. About 40% of the dioceses also produce weekly or daily radio programming in Spanish. Some of the radio programming is jointly supported by dioceses in the same region.
    The challenges ...

    • The effect of proselytism on Hispanics appears to have increased dramatically in recent years. In 1990, only 12% of the diocesan directors said that the religious activities of Protestant groups were affecting Hispanics to "a great extent." In 1998, more than four times as many directors (a total of 52%) said that this was true. Many of the newest and poorest immigrants were first evangelized by Protestants in their home countries. However, the effects of proselytism are also being felt among older and more established Hispanics, including baptized but passive Catholics who maintain multiple "affiliations."

    • Christian "base" communities have declined in importance as a small faith experience among Hispanics. Base communities, which are intended to orient Hispanics to faith-based social action, were identified in past "Encuentros" as a top priority for Hispanic ministry. However, only 15% of the diocesan directors said their office was devoting significant attention to this area. Some of the newest immigrants from Mexico and Central America are participating in authentic base communities, particularly male migrant workers who feel isolated in rural areas. However, base communities established in more concentrated urban areas have frequently withered, due to a lack of focus and ongoing coordination.

    Source Materials

    The Hispanic Reality At A Glance

    Estimates for the total US Hispanic population in 1998 and 2010 are from two sources: the U.S. Census Bureau, which produces annual estimates based on the 1990 Census; and Strategy Research Corporation, which conducts telephone surveys in major Latino markets every two years. See, for example, The Hispanic Market, 1998. Census estimates and other Census data are available on-line at: http://venus.censtis.gov/cdrom/lookup.

    Figures on the Hispanic native-born and foreign-born are from Jorge del Pinal and Audrey Singer, Generations of Diversity: Latinos in the United States (Wash., DC: Population Reference Bureau, 1997).

    Estimates of the percentage of Hispanics who identify as Catholic are from two sources: the General Social Survey, as tabulated by the National Opinion Research Center in Chicago; and telephone surveys conducted by Strategy Research Corporation. Estimates for Catholic population growth due to Hispanics since 1960 and the current percentage of Catholics who are Hispanic are presented in The Hispanic Market 1994, published by Strategy Research Corporation.

    Figures on US priests, seminarians and parishes are from the Official Catholic Directory (1998) and the Catholic Almanac (1999).

    Review of Findings

    Information on the educational backgrounds and salaries of diocesan directors of religious education was; obtained from a 1998 report by the National Conference of Catechetical Leadership, entitled, National Profile of Diocesan Directors of Religious Education, by Thomas and Rita Walters. The report also provided the estimate for the percentage of DREs who are Hispanic.

    Information on the number of seminarians in the Northeast region in 1982-1983 was obtained from a twovolume study by the New York Archdiocese's Office of Pastoral Research, entitled Hispanics in New York. Religious, Cultural and Social Experiences (New York: Office of Pastoral Research, 1982).

    Summary and Reflections

    Data comparing poor Hispanic and poor non-Hispanic participation in Catholic schools can be found in Joan Moore and Harry Pachon, Hispanics in the United States (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1985), p. 157, The recent study at Catholic University was by Stewart Lawrence and is a chapter in the forthcoming book, The Present Role and Future Impact of Catholic Schools, James Youniss, ed. (New York: Teachers College Press). Data on the Hispanic percentage of services provided by Catholic Charities were provided by Dr. Sheila Jones, research director of Catholic Charities, USA.


    Select Bibliography

    Institutional Histories

    Diaz-Stevens, Ana Maria. 1994. Oxcart Catholicism on Fifth Avenue: The Impact of the Puerto Rican Migration on the New York Archdiocese. Notre Dame: IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Dolan, Jay and Allan Figueroa Deck. 1994. Hispanic Catholic Culture in the U.S. Notre Dame: IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Dolan, Jay and Gilberto Hinojosa, eds. 1994. Mexican Americans and the Catholic Church, 1900-1965. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Dolan, Jay and Jaime Vidal eds. 1994. Puerto Rican and Cuban Catholics in the US., 1900-1965. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Horgan, Paul. 1975. Lamy of Santa Fe. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    McNally, Michael J. 1984. Catholicism in South Florida, 1868-1968. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.

    Sanchez, George J. 1993. Becoming Mexican American: Ethnicity, Culture and Identity in Chicano Los Angeles, 1900-1945. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Sandoval, Moises. 1990. On the Move: A History of the Hispanic Church in the United States. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis.

    Weyr, Thomas. 1988. Hispanic U.S.A.: Breaking the Melting Pot, New York: Harper & Row.

    Local and National Surveys

    Doyle, Ruth and Olga Scarpetta, eds. 1982. Hispanics in New York: Religious, Cultural and Social Experiences, Vols. I and 11. New York: Office of Pastoral Research and Planning, Archdiocese of New York.

    Gonzdlez, Roberto O. and Michael La Velle. 1985. The Hispanic Catholic in the United States: A SocioCultural and Religious Profile, New York: Northeast Catholic Pastoral Center for Hispanics.

    Grebler, Leo; Joan Moore; and Ralph Guzman. 1970. The Mexican-American People. New York: The Free Press.

    Greeley, Andrew. 1997. "Defection Among Hispanics," America, September 27.

    Greely, Andrew. 1988. "Defection Among Hispanics," America, July 30.

    Markides, Kyriakos and Thomas Cole. 1985. "Change and Continuity in Mexican-American Religious Behavior: A Three-Generation Study," in Rodolofo 0. de la Garza, et al., eds. The Mexican-American Experience: An Interdisciplinary Anthology. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Moore, Joan and Harry Pach6n. 1985. Hispanics in the United States. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    O. de La Garza, Rodolfo. 1992. Latino Voices: Mexican, Puerto Rican and Cuban Perspectives on American Politics. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Pefialosa, Fernando and Edward McDonagh. 1966. "Social Mobility in a Mexican-American Community," Social Forces, 44.

    Ethnographic Studies

    Adams, Anna. 1997. "Brincando el Charco/Jumping the Puddle: A Case Study of Pentecostalism's Journey from Puerto Rico to New York to Allentown, Pennsylvania," in Edward L. Cleary and Hannah W. Stewart-Gambino, eds., Power, Politics and Pentecostals in Latin America. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Betances, Samuel and Cristobal Berry-Caban. 1979. "The Puerto Rican Full Gospel Church of' Milwaukee." Unpublished manuscript.

    Bums, Allan 1993. Maya in Exile: Guatemalans in Florida. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Earle, Duncan M. 1994. "Constructions of Refugee Identity: Guatemalan Mayas in Mexico and South Florida," in Linda Camino and Ruth Krulfeld, eds., Reconstructing Lives, Recapturing Meaning. Basel: Godon and Breach.

    Garcia, Maria Cristina. 1996. Havana USA: Cuban Exiles and Cuban Americans in South Florida, 1959-1994. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Levitt, Peggy. 1998. "Local-level Global Religion: The Case of U.S.-Dominican Migration," Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 1.

    Poblete, Renate and Thomas O'Dea. 1960. "Anomie and the Quest for Community: The Formation of Sects Among the Puerto Ricans of New York," American Catholic Sociological Review, 21,1.

    Sexton, Patricia. 1965. Spanish Harlem: An Anatomy of Poverty. New York: Harper & Row.

    Tweed, Thomas. 1997. Our Lady of the Exile: Diasporic Politics at a Cuban Catholic Shrine in, Miami. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Vlach, Norita. 1992. The Quetzal in Flight: Guatemalan Refugee Families in the United States Westport: Prager.

    Wellmeier, Nancy. 1998. Ritual, Identity and Mayan Diaspora. Garland Publishers.

    Popular Religiosity and Folk Religion

    Gregory, Steven. 1987. "Afro-Caribbean Religions in New York City: The Case of Santeria," in Constance Sutton and Elsa Chaney, eds., Caribbean Life in New York City: Socio-Cultural Dimensions. New York: Center for Migration Studies.

    Harwood, Alan. 1977. Rx: Spiritualist As Needed: A Study of a Puerto Rican Community Mental Health Resource. Ithaca: Cornel University Press.

    Lefever, Harry G. 1996. "When the Saints Go Riding In: Santeria in Cuba and the United States," Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 35.

    Murphy, Joseph. 1993. Santeria: African Spirits in America. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Perez y Mena, Andres 1. 1998. "Cuban Santeria, Haitian Vodun, Puerto Rican Spiritualism: A Multiculturalist Inquiry into Syncretism," Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 1.

    Stevens-Arroyo, Anthony and Ana Maria Diaz-Stevens, eds. 1995. An Enduring Flame: Studies on Latino Popular Religiosity. New York: Bildner Center Series on Latinos and Religion.

    Vidal, Jaime. 1989. "Popular Religion in the Lands of Origin of New York's Hispanic Population," in Ruth Doyle and Olga Scarpetta, eds., Hispanics in New York: Religious, Cultural and Social Experiences, Vols. I and 11. New York: Office of Pastoral Research and Planning.




    On-site Interviews

    1. Background and Methodology

      This part of the study was commissioned by the Bishops' Committee on Hispanic Affairs of the U.S. Catholic Conference in the spring of 1998. It seeks to provide qualitative information to supplement the survey of diocesan bishops and directors/coordinators of Hispanic ministry also commissioned by the committee on the same year. The intent of this aspect of the research was to help corroborate the findings of the quantitative study. Using a series of questions in English and Spanish, the interviews were conducted between the fall of 1998 and the spring of 1999. Diocesan bishops who were available were interviewed, as well as diocesan directors of Hispanic ministry, chancery officials, pastors, pastoralists, and laity. In addition, efforts were made to attend at least one Spanish-language Mass in a parish setting.

      The methodology of the study included meetings of the researchers with research advisors and experts from The Catholic University of America and the National Conference of Catholic Bishops/United States Catholic Conference to discuss variables, goals, and procedures. Eight dioceses were selected for four-days on-site visits by the researchers. Each researcher was assigned four dioceses. Separate test visits to two of the eight dioceses were conducted in the fall of 1998 by the researchers. A follow-up meeting to discuss the experience and to improve the methodology took place in December 1998.

    2. General Profile

      The eight dioceses selected provided major characteristics necessary for a well-rounded picture of Hispanic ministry in the United States. These characteristics include: 1) an active and well-established Hispanic ministry office or director, 2) rural and urban ministry either in different dioceses or in the same one, 3) representative of the different geographical regions of the U.S., 4) a diversity of Hispanic national/cultural groups, and 5) a variety of approaches to Hispanic ministry. In addition, it was decided to include dioceses that are less well-known for their Hispanic ministry efforts and experience. Because research has recently been done on the Midwest region, it was decided to visit two dioceses in the Far West.

      The eight dioceses visited were Brooklyn (North East region), Ft. Worth (South West region), Omaha (North Central region), Orange (Far West region), San Jose (Far West region), Santa Fe (Mountain States region), Seattle (North West region), and Tampa-St. Petersburg (South East region). Estimates of the Hispanic Catholic populations in these dioceses range from 30% to 80% and include representatives from every Spanish-speaking nation in the world. Nonetheless, the majority population of most of the dioceses visited is Mexican; followed by Mexican-Americans, Puerto Ricans, Dominicans, Cubans, and Central Americans depending on the diocese. Some dioceses had been actively involved in the encuentro process from its onset and others have been beneficiaries of the process. Some dioceses are far advanced in Hispanic Ministry and its integration into the total pastoral efforts of the local church. Others are in the beginning stages of establishing an office, developing of a local pastoral plan, and training pastoral leaders to help meet the needs of the growing Hispanic community. The dioceses have done a good job of hiring well prepared directors and staff members and some have even hired parish pastoral ministers.

      The majority of Hispanics in the dioceses visited can be classified as poor and lower-middle class, although there are substantial numbers of families who are economically and educationally well-off. This number is increasing slowly. Nonetheless, Hispanics tend to fill the lower echelon of jobs in the service, agriculture, food processing, and manufacturing industries. There is much mobility as people seek better jobs, better housing, and greater freedom from immigration officials. They are affected by many problems including low wages, unsafe working conditions, and long hours.

      Certain characteristics were frequently cited by informants as troublesome. These include the arrival of young men who come to earn money to send home and who find themselves in an environment they do not understand. In some cases they might even get into trouble with the law. They tend to work in service jobs although some work as farm workers or in non-skilled construction or factory jobs. Some are married and have left their spouses and children in their homelands; at times they begin to live with other women and have children by them, thus, creating two families: one in the US and one in their homeland. A related characteristic is the number of marriages requiring validation or regularization. Many pastoralists describe the great need among Hispanics for basic catechesis and instruction in church doctrine. Others describe the alienation caused by church regulations for baptisms, first communions, quince aρos celebrations, and marriages as well as those caused by requirements for parish registration prior to the reception of key sacraments or social services. Another troublesome characteristic is the "second generation syndrome:" many of our informants were at a loss as to how to minister to the growing group of Hispanics who either speak no Spanish, tend to drop out of school, have poor self-esteem, or feel uncertain about their identity. Finally, conflict among different generations of Hispanics, including different immigrant waves and national groups, is a growing concern.

      Despite these concerns, Hispanics in these dioceses are creating a resurgence of the Catholic Church in some parishes which the number of Catholics was decreasing. There is evidence of vibrant parishes marked by both a rich liturgical and devotional life as well as participation by Hispanics in formation and ministerial programs. Many Hispanics are energized and motivated to participate in the life of the parish by their activity in Charismatic Renewal and other prayer groups and in the different apostolic movements. They have a great thirst for knowledge of the Bible as well as for leadership formation. In many of the dioceses visited, the Hispanic community has led to a renewal of devotional practices and to an increase in parish activities centered on spiritual development. Women in particular are volunteering, and at times being hired, as pastoral assistants in the areas of catechesis as well as general pastoral ministry. Men and women are participating in continuing education programs. The Church, by means of activist priests and others, has been particularly adept at raising the consciousness of the Hispanic community. Many Hispanic Catholics are now participating in political and social activities that serve to make the community more visible and thus more credible to the dominant culture. In general, Hispanics both appear to be both in need of the Church's ministry and ready to take leadership in ministering to their own and others.

    3. Key Issues and Challenges

      1. Leadership development and formation

        All the dioceses visited exhibited a shortage of Hispanic leadership at all levels. While the shortage of priests is a generalized problem throughout the country, the lack of Hispanic priests is particularly challenging, given demographic trends. Informants frequently stated that their greatest need was for Hispanic priests, who, among other things, could celebrate the Mass and perform sacraments in Spanish. Often times the few Sunday masses in Spanish are too crowded, forcing people to stand in the aisles and at the back of the church, where they cannot feel truly welcomed.

        To respond to the shortage of Hispanic priests, some of the dioceses have invited priests from Latin America. This strategy has some important implications, not all necessarily positive. For instance, many of the priests who come to this country end up staying, leaving dioceses in Latin America even more strapped for resources. Conversely, because many of the Latin American priests come to minister specifically to Spanish-speaking populations, they end up not learning English, thereby failing to reach English-speaking Hispanics and other members of the parish. This, in turn, can lead to the segregation of Spanish-speaking Hispanics from the rest of the Church. Moreover, many Latin American priests bring models of pastoral work and understandings of church which may be at odds with the parish life and experience of U.S. Latinos. This difference can lead to priests taking insensitive positions towards the local populations.

        In the absence of Hispanic priests, informants consistently expressed their desire to have more bilingual priests, who can not only "read" the mass in Spanish but, more importantly, imbue it with the deep spirituality and joy that characterize Hispanic Catholicism. Wbile all of the informants appreciated the sincere efforts made by nonHispanic priests to overcome the language barrier, there was agreement that what is needed are priests who can understand and cherish the living culture and spmtuality of Hispanics. Such an understanding emerges only out of an attitude of conversion to the Hispanic condition and, thus, it is not necessarily tied to a particular national or ethnic origin. In fact, in some cases, having Hispanic ancestry did not automatically guarantee a greater openness towards substantial sectors of the Hispanic population. On the other hand, some informants mentioned the need to be vigilant less the Church fall into a paternalism of love – a kind of overly protective ministry to Hispanics by non-Hispanics. This attitude can end up, as an unintended consequence, thwarting the development of Hispanic leadership within the Church.

        At the level of the laity, shortage of leadership is due to serious deficits in formation and training. While many of the dioceses we visited have made the formation of lay leadership a priority, there are often administrative constraints that limit the access of Hispanics to seminaries, institutes, and other leadership initiatives. Given the high dropout rate among Hispanic high school students, the requirement of having completed higher education tends to exclude many potential candidates from important positions of leadership (for example in the chancery). Many times those excluded are the Hispanics who are most involved in the life of the parish. This situation not only leads to the loss of committed leadership for the Church but also creates feelings of rejection among active members of the laity. A related problem is the failure to tap into lay leaders who have had extensive training in Latin America, simply because they do not have the right credentials in the United States.

        The challenge of lay leadership goes beyond numbers. Even when there are trained lay leaders in the parish, it is not uncommon for them to be marginalized or delegitimized by priests, who feel threatened or might not be willing to decentralize some of the pastoral work. Unfortunately, the laity can also play a negative role here, as they often prefer dealing with priests instead of permanent deacons or lay ministers. One leader stated "for us the priest's word is what counts; the lay person, no matter how well prepared, has no credibility."

        One final element within this heading is the intense desire of the Hispanic laity to receive proper biblical formation. One informant put things starkly: "the sects are eating us alive, simply because we don't know the Bible and when they cite it to us, we get all confused and don't know how to respond, to defend our faith."

      2. Incorporation versus assimilation

        There is an on-going tension between those who propose that the best way to bring Hispanics into the Church is by assimilating them into mainstream Catholicism and culture in the United States as fast as possible, and those who advocate that true incorporation requires that Hispanics be welcomed first on their own terms. Assimilationists tend to favor programs and pastoral activities underlining the need to learn English and U.S. customs right away. In contrast, the other position contends that forcing Hispanics to assimilate immediately only reproduces their subaltern status within the Church. Lacking the training and internal community resources, they are often assimilated in marginal positions. In this view, it is first necessary for Hispanics to feel that the parish is their home, and this requires providing special services, often in Spanish. Once Hispanics feel invested in the Church, the task of identifying and forming leadership begins (also in Spanish). Once the Hispanic Catholic community has gained sufficient strength, then and only then, can one talk of its incorporation into the larger parish. Critics of this gradualist view of incorporation often claim that there is a danger of making the same mistakes of the past, of producing exclusionary "mini national parishes" that divide the Church.

        With some dissenting voices, particularly in the Northeast, the consensus was, that given the increasing cultural and ethnic diversity within the Church, it is not advisable to go back to the national parish model. Most of informants endorsed the idea of a multicultural Church. However, tensions arose around how to construct a truly multicultural Church. The dioceses visited encompassed, sometimes uncomfortably, some pastoral leaders who advocated rapid assimilation and others who defended gradual incorporation. These tensions often colored the work of the diocesan Office of Hispanic Ministry (OHM). In fact, in some instances, the Office of Hispanic Ministry functioned as a parallel mini-chancery, a fact that gave it some autonomy but also isolated it from the rest of diocese. At other places, the OHM was dissolved and its various members re-assigned to diocesan offices such as youth outreach and religious education, mostly as assistants, raising the issue of subordinate assimilation.

      3. The Tension between multiplicity and unity in the parish

        Among Hispanics, the parish structure finds itself under challenge by a complex host of social and religious variables. First, the increasing differentiation and mobility of the Hispanic population severely strain parish resources. Parishes tend to be overwhelmed by the massive influxes of Latinos, often coming from countries and cultures previously not present in the area. This is the case of some parishes in the Northeast which have witnessed the rapid growth of Mexican immigration in the past ten years. It is not uncommon for newer waves of Latino immigrants to appear as soon as parishes have readjusted their resources and outreach work. All the while, the formerly new immigrants may have moved to another parish or diocese, as they stabilize their condition or search for new jobs. Furthermore, parishes also have to contend with migration from nonLatinos as well as the gentrification of urban areas. All this fluidity and fragmentation challenges the parish to continue to anchor self and community life.

        A second challenge to the parish is the internal multiplicity of pastoral models, including traditionalist, reformist and transformative approaches, which often co-exist without clear, overarching coordination. Often times, parishes choose to privilege one approach, leaving significant areas of pastoral work unattended. This, in turn, creates resentment within certain sectors of the parish population. More specifically, for all their valuable contributions, apostolic movements can be a source of potential intra-church division. Often they adopt a quasi-sectarian attitude, focusing single-mindedly on their own activities and growth and neglecting the welfare of the parish. Given their success among Hispanics, apostolic movements tend to see themselves as holding the right way of being church. This attitude can set these groups against those in the parish who are involved in other pastoral approaches and even against each other. This division, in turn, makes coordination of Hispanic ministry more difficult.

      4. Increasing Hispanic diversity

        The last three decades have seen an increasing differentiation in the Hispanic population, especially along lines of nationality, class, and race. New waves of immigration from Latin America have posed many challenges to Puerto Ricans, Cuban-Americans, and Mexican Americans, the most established Latino immigrant groups. While the latter have generally extended a warm reception to the newer arrivals, In some cases, belonging to the parish community is determined by time of arrival. As a result, newly arrived immigrants, who often come in large waves, are treated like foreigners, outsiders, taking away valuable resources from the locals without contributing anything to the Church.

        The existence of multiple nationalities in a single parish sometimes also leads to other types of tensions. Since there is a close link between the construction on nationhood and local forms of popular Catholicism, each Latino nationality brings its own way of celebrating collective identity, including particular Catholic rituals and beliefs. Sometimes, national differences dovetail with affiliation to particular apostolic movements (for example, Cubans tended to be more present in the leadership of the Cursillo movement, while Puerto Ricans more often involved with the Charismatic Renewal), increasing tensions among various pastoral approaches. When the Church fails to recognize these important national and ethnic differences among Latinos or dismisses them by simply appealing to the fact that "we are all Catholic," conflicts may even become more polarizing.

        In addition to divisions around nationality, recent changes in the economy have led, on the one hand, to the formation of a growing Latino middle-class and, on the other, to persistent poverty in large sectors of the Hispanic population. This widening gap has important implications for pastoral work. As one of informants shared: "two populations are particularly vulnerable to evangelical Protestantism. One is the recently arrived immigrant, many of them very poor, who get lost in the U.S., with no one to care for them. The other [group] is made up of middle class Hispanics, who have been here for a long time and have felt the great pressure to assimilate. These people are attracted to Protestant megachurches where the gospel of health, wealth, and wisdom. is preached. There they find justification and celebration of their upward mobility. There, they find the personal therapies to deal with their family and work problems."

        There is a similar tension in the Southeast, where there is a widening gap between upwardly mobile, urban and white Cuban-Americans and mostly poor, mestizo, rural workers in peripheral areas. With this example, the issue of race and ethnicity is introduced as a potentially divisive force among Latino Catholics. This issue was not restricted to one part of the country. There is a large migrant farm population working in the flower, f1ruit, and food processing industry. These immigrants are mostly Amerindians from Southern Mexico and Central America, who do not speak Spanish, although they are identified as Mexicans by the locals. On top of the usual racism experienced by other Hispanics, these immigrants also suffer discrimination by earlier arrivals, often on the basis of their ethnicity and socio-economic status.

      5. Intergenerational conflicts

        Intergenerational conflicts crystallize around second generation Hispanics, a group that is bound to continue growing as the newer immigrants from the Dominican Republic, Mexico, Central and South America begin to settle in the United States. Second generation Hispanics have pressures and predicaments that are specific to their condition of being simultaneously in two worlds. On the one hand, they have been brought up according to Latin American ideals and norms, which have defined their parents' lives. On the other, they have had to construct their own ways to negotiate the challenge of everyday life in this country. Often, the demands of these two identities collide, leading to personal confusion and parent-child conflicts. For instance, it is not uncommon for parents to demand that their children receive religious education and the sacraments in Spanish, despite the fact that many of these children are English-dominant. At the same time, parents have the right and responsibility to be involved in their children's religious education.

        A case in point of the particular challenges involved in outreach to second generation Hispanics can be found in dioceses in the Southwest. Some informants believed that the hardest group to reach is the Mexican-American community. According to one pastor, Mexican-Americans have become "too Americanized." While they are generally more economically stable and educated than newly arrived immigrants, they tend to have more broken marriages and divorces. Part of the problem is that they have become "secularized," putting more stress on material goods and social activities than on church participation and spiritual growth. Also the issue of mixed marriages poses a challenge, since it leads many to join the non-Catholic churches of their spouses. Other informants remarked that since second and third generation Mexican Americans are English dominant, many go to English only parishes where they often find a different style of worship that is not as celebratory and community-oriented as that found in Hispanic congregations. As a result, some Mexican-Americans who still speak Spanish might return to the Hispanic parishes, but just to receive the sacraments, and not to be actively involved in church life. Alternatively, they may find themselves without a place in the Church to feel at home.

        Highlighting this fact, some pastoral ministers pay special attention to the newly arrived because of their urgent needs, many times leaving second generation Hispanics abandoned.

      6. The tension between popular religiosity and evangelization

        Despite the fact that there has been a clear change in attitudes towards popular devotions since Vatican II, instances of discrimination can still be found. This is evident in practices such as the quinceaρeras and the celebrations organized by brotherhoods around their patron saint. In the eyes of some pastors, popular devotions are nothing more than "a Catholicism of a day" which focus on rituals and symbols, stressing great but isolated moments of fervor, yet failing to translate into deep and lasting spiritual transformation and sustained participation in the life of the Church. Some pastors mentioned that practices like quinceaneras are too time-consuming, especially when there are other more important pastoral needs such as celebrating the Mass and other sacraments.

        Many times, appealing to the need to engage in a true evangelization, pastors have sought to eliminate the practices of popular devotion, encouraging people to participate instead in more modern apostolic movements such as Cursillo or the Charismatic Renewal. One pastor shared that popular religious practices should only be used as a stepping stone to greater faith maturity and then dropped. Since popular Catholicism has a long history of resilience and relative autonomy, its rejection and marginalization only serves to alienate Latinos from the Church.

      7. The tension between a pastoral focus on the sacraments and one stressing social justice.

        In spite of the important efforts to link faith and social action through ecumenical church-based organizations, pastoral work among Hispanics has tended to emphasize the sacramental dimension. Furthermore, under pressure by the loss of Hispanics to various religions groups, particularly to evangelical Protestantism, there has been a shift in small faith-sharing communities – from social reflection and action, towards an almost exclusive focus on prayer and personal conversion.

        There has to be a more concerted effort to respond to issues such as the persistence of racism, the emergence of violent anti-immigrant nativism, the promulgation of unjust immigration laws, and the deepening of poverty among Latinos. These issues affect the fabric of Latino life, dividing families, undermining communities, and force people to focus on everyday survival rather than on practicing and living out their faith. All these social realities make evangelization and the welcoming of Latinos into the Church more difficult.

        Even though numerically and in terms of commitment, Latinas are an essential force withing the Catholic Church, they are among the most affected by current socio-economic changes, such as the downsizing of welfare programs. The high rate of female-headed households, with women sometimes working two or three jobs to support their families, is another troubling reality. The situation of Latinas is aggravated by persistent sexism. In the extreme, this sexism can lead to violent subordination of women by their husbands and partners. Special effort should be made to address these issues.

      8. The existence of a restricted view of stewardship

        One problem often found, particularly in places where the Hispanic population is relatively new or poor, is that Hispanics do not feel included in the process of decision-making within the parish. This despite the fact that they maybe numerically the most significant group in the parish. In this type of situation Latinos are more likely to reject efforts to construct a multicultural parish in favor of one that is fully Hispanic, where they can find representation in the various parish structures. As one lay leader put it: "I am discouraged by the fact that we, Hispanics, don't count here in this parish. We come to mass in great numbers and our Masses are really filled with the spirit But all the power is in the hands of a small group of (non-Hispanic] old-timers who contribute a lot of money to the Church."

      9. Ministering effectively to Hispanic youth

        The challenges identified under this heading have to do with the multiple experiences associated with Hispanic youth. Hispanics use the term not just for teenagers but also for young adults, that is, single men and women. In view of this expanded definition, the problem of youth gangs, although prominent in many of the sites visited, is just one of the most visible symptoms of the larger reality faced by young Latinos. This reality includes persistent poverty and lack of employment opportunities, high drop-out rates, racism in schools and job places, the breakdown of Latino families and communities, the pressures to survive in environments often marked by high level of crime, and the ever-presence of a consumerist culture and a culture of violence and death promoted by the entertainment industry.

        To deal with all these obstacles young Latinos search for spaces where they can rearticulate their lost family and community. Often, they cannot find this space in the Church, because they are seen by elders with suspicion and bafflement. They then turn, in small but significant numbers, to gangs for the intimacy, loyalty, acceptance, and a sense of pride that the larger society cannot give them.

        In many ways, the issues facing Hispanic youth dovetail with those confronting second generation Hispanics, as both generational and age differences are at the core of family miscommunication and conflict. Given the fact that the Latino population in this country is overwhelmingly young (approximately 50 percent are under the age of twenty-six years of age and over 33% under the age of eighteen), the Church ignores Hispanic youth at its own peril.

      10. The loss of Hispanics to other faiths

        According to a recent article by Andrew Greeley (America 09/27/97), the "equivalent of one out of seven Hispanics has left Catholicism in a little more than a quarter of a century. The annual loss is approximately one half of one percent. If this hemorrhage should continue for the next 25 years, half of all American Hispanics will not be Catholic." Greeley estimates that 600,000 Hispanics are lost to the Church every year. This loss, in his view, "exceeds that of early Irish immigrants to the American South. It is the worst defection in the history of the Catholic Church in the United States."

        While data available in this area is insufficient at best, there is a generalized attitude of concern among the laity. There were several problems which informants identified as making Hispanics feel not welcomed in the Catholic Church and, as a result, making them more open to alternative religious denominations. Many informants believed that, in contrast to evangelical Protestant churches, excessive administrative tasks and rules in Catholic churches often override a spontaneous, personal, and warm reception. Some Hispanics complained about having to fill out complicated forms and produce evidence of being registered (such as showing contribution envelopes) before they could receive the sacraments. In many of these cases, Catholic ritual becomes almost commodified, subject to a kind of bureacratization that blunts its spiritual power. Often times, rituals and sacraments under these conditions do not serve as the basis for evangelizing, for bringing people closer to the Church.

        Finally, other informants reported that Hispanics are attracted to evangelical Protestant churches by a powerful preaching that skillfully links the Scriptures with examples from everyday predicaments and by the notion of church as an extended family in Christ. Family is here equated not only with intimacy but also with a strict ethos that provides clear orientation to its various members.

      11. Welcoming Hispanics within an increasingly culturally diverse Church

        Visiting various dioceses provided an opportunity to better sense the increasing cultural diversity within the Church. In many places, Hispanics worship together not only with Euro-Americans and African-Americans, but also with Haitians, Filipinos, Vietnamese, Polish, and recently arrived Irish Catholics. Often these groups experience a faster upward economic mobility, which translates into influence in church affairs. This leaves many Hispanics resentful, feeling marginalized by the Church. Given the Church's limited resources, the challenge is to welcome and affirm Latino voices without excluding other voices that have also been at the margins of the Church. Put in other words, the challenge is simultaneously to affirm that "we are a church of many faces," with Latinos as an important prophetic presence, and renew our commitment to a common Catholic identity and mission.



    Appendices

    A. Map of Episcopal Regions



    B. Tables

    Table 1: Hispanic Ministry Office, By Number of Years in Existence

    Longevity (In Years) Percent of Total Offices Cumulative Percent
    0-4
    5-9
    10-19
    20 or more
    27.8
    17.6
    24.7
    29.9
    27.8
    45.4
    70.1
    100.0

    Mean Years = 13.0

    Table 2: Hispanic Ministry Directors, By Number of Years in Current Position

    Longevity (In Years) Percent of Total Directors Cumulative Percent
    0-1
    2-4
    5-9
    10-19
    20 or more
    23.5
    33.4
    24.5
    15.7
    2.9
    23.5
    56.9
    81.4
    97.1
    100.0

    Mean Years = 5.4

    Table 2B: Hispanic Ministry Directors, By Educational Attainment

    Degree Percent of Total Directors Cumulative Percent
    Some College/Technical
    Bachelors
    Masters
    Doctorate
    7.8
    25.2
    59.2
    7.8
    7.8
    33.0
    92.2
    100.0

    Table 3: Percentage of Diocesan Staff of Hispanic Origin

    Percent of Staff Percent of Dioceses Cumulative Percent
    Central Management:
    0
    0-1
    1-5
    5-10
    10-30
    30-50
    50-100

    Central Support Staff:
    0
    0-1
    1-5
    5-10
    10-35
    35-50
    50-100

    Catholic Charities Management:
    0
    0-1
    1-10
    10-28
    28-50
    50-100

    Catholic Charities Support Staff:
    0
    0-1
    1-5
    5-10
    10-30
    30-50
    50-100

    63.2
    13.7
    9.4
    3.2
    3.1
    4.2
    3.2


    49.5
    11.8
    18.3
    4.3
    5.3
    3.3
    7.5


    72.8
    7.4
    8.7
    6.2
    3.7
    1.2


    50.6
    13.0
    18.2
    5.2
    7.8
    1.3
    3.9
    63.2
    76.9
    86.3
    89.5
    92.6
    96.8
    100.0


    49.5
    61.3
    79.6
    83.9
    89.2
    92.5
    100.0


    72.8
    80.2
    88.9
    95.1
    98.8
    100.0


    50.6
    63.6
    81.8
    87.0
    94.8
    96.1
    100.0

    Table 4: Rates of Diocesan Collaboration in Hispanic Ministry, By Department and Type of Collaboration


    TYPE OF COLLABORATION
    Department
    None
    Project Basis
    Ongoing
    Religious Education

    Catholic Charities

    Evangelization

    Youth Ministry

    Adult Education

    Liturgy

    Pastoral Planning

    Family Life

    Catholic Schools

    African American Ministry

    Ecumenism

    Asian Ministry
    21.4

    36.3

    47.5

    37.9

    49.5

    46.5

    53.4

    48.5

    70.6

    78.8

    86.1

    94.0
    27.2

    21.6

    13.9

    24.3

    13.6

    17.2

    13.6

    23.3

    14.7

    7.1

    8.9

    3.0
    51.5

    42.2

    38.6

    37.9

    36.9

    36.4

    33.0

    28.2

    14.7

    14.1

    5.0

    3.0

    Table 5: Types of Hispanic Parish Presence

    Parish Type No. Pct.
    Mixed or Parallel 1,134 46.1
    "Multi-Cultural" 584 23.7
    "Personal or National" 85 3.5
    Missions or Chapels 149 6.1
    Masses Only 263 10.7
    In Transition to Hispanic Ministry 245 10.0

    Sub-Total 2,460* 100.1

    Not Broken Down By Type 698**

    Total Reported 3,158 (Mean=23.4 per diocese)
    Total Projected
    Minimum
    Maximum

    3,509***
    3,617****

    Based on I I I dioceses reporting.
    ** Another 24 dioceses provided the total number of parishes with a significant Hispanic presence, but did not break these parishes down by type.
    *** Based on 150 dioceses, if the reported parish-per-diocese ratio (23.4) is held constant.
    ****Based on estimates from an additional 27 dioceses with Spanish masses but no diocesan-level Hispanic Ministry.


    Table 6: Percentage of Parishes with Hispanic Activities, By Type of Activity

    Type of Activity Pct.
    Catechesis 49.8
    Adult Catechesis 36.9
    Charismatic Renewal 36.1
    Youth Ministry 30.1
    Cursillo 29.6
    Lay Leadership Formation 26.6
    RENEW 25.1
    RCIA 18.8
    Talleres de Oración 17.0
    Base Communities 13.1
    Disciples in Mission 9.4


    Table 7: Hispanic Priests, by Type

    Type No. Pct.
    Incardinated 519 43.7
    Religious 487 41.0
    Extern 181 15.2
    Subtotal 1,187
    Type Unknown 631

    Total 1,818 99.9%

    Hispanic priests per diocese: 13.5

    Hispanic priests as % of US priests: 3.81

    _____________________
    1 According to statistics compiled by the official Catholic directory, there are currently 47,582 priests in the U.S. Of these, 31,657 are diocesan priests and 15,925 are religious priests.


    Table 8: Hispanic Priests, by Episcopal Region

    Region No. Pct. Pct. of Hispanic
    Pop. (1996)
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    12
    13
    25
    123
    57
    396
    25
    11
    179
    1
    13
    318
    428
    21
    221
    1.4
    6.8
    3.1
    21.8
    1.4
    0.6
    9.8
    0.1
    0.7
    17.5
    23.5
    1.2
    12.2
    2.5
    9.0
    4.3
    10.1
    0.9
    1.5
    4.9
    0.3
    1.0
    17.9
    35.3
    2.2
    10.1
    Total 1,818 100.1% 100.0%


    Table 9: Percentage of Dioceses with Language and Cultural Education Programs for Priest Candidates, 1990 and 1998

    Program 1990 1998
    Mandatory Spanish
    ESL Program for Hispanic Seminarians
    Cultural Studies
    Summer Pastoral Work w/Hispanics
    Workshops on Popular Religiosity
    31.3
    18.4
    55.0
    60.6
    47.7
    51.5
    39.4
    76.3
    70.4
    29.3


    Table 10: Percentage of Religious Personnel Receiving Continuing Education about Hispanics, All Dioceses, 1990 and 1998


    YEAR
    Program
    1990
    1998

    Priests
    Sisters
    Total
    Spanish Language
    Hispanic Culture
    Devotions
    Sacramental Life
    9.1
    10.0
    7.9
    13.1
    5.5
    7.8
    5.7
    9.4
    3.6
    7.1
    2.7
    5.7


    Table 11: Hispanic Seminarians, By Region

    Region Number Pct. of Total
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    12
    13
    15
    40
    14
    79
    3
    17
    146
    6
    6
    73
    55
    21
    36
    2.9
    7.8
    2.7
    15.5
    0.6
    3.3
    28.6
    1.2
    1.2
    14.4
    10.8
    4.1
    7.0
    Total 511 100.0

    Mean = 3.8 per diocese


    Talbe 12: Percentage of Dioceses with Hispanic Seminarians, By Number of Seminarians

    Number Pct. Cumulative Pct.
    0
    1-2
    3-4
    5-10
    More than 10
    47.9
    25.6
    6.4
    13.7
    6.4
    47.9
    73.5
    79.9
    93.6
    100.0


    Table 13: Number of Hispanic Catholics in Formation, By Program and Gender, 1998



    PERCENT
    Program Number Female Male
    Catechesis
    Adult Catechesis
    Youth
    Diaconate
    50,225
    7,050
    4,015
    682
    64.6
    66.2
    55.7
    0
    35.4
    33.8
    44.3
    100.0
    Total 61,972


    Table 14: Challenge of Proselytism, 1990 and 1998


    YEAR
    Magnitude of Challenge 1990 1998
    Very significant
    Significant
    Not very significant
    11.5
    42.3
    46.2
    51.5
    41.4
    7.1

    100.0 100.0


    Table 15: Church Response to Challenge of Proselytism

    Quality of Response Pct. of Dioceses
    Very good
    Fair to Good
    Poor
    3.3
    51.1
    45.6

    100.0


    Table 16: Overall State of Hispanics in the Church

    Statement Agree Disagree
    My diocese is "losing" Hispanics in large numbers 43.4 56.6
    My diocese has yet to develop effective programs to reach Hispanic youth 83.5 16.5
    My diocese has not done enough to encourage Hispanics to assume important leadership positions 63.3 36.7
    Hispanics in my diocese do not have sufficient skills or experience to assume many leadership positions. 59.8 40.2


    Table 17: Suggested Program Priorities for Hispanic Ministry, By Percentage of Survey Respondents*

    Program Pct.
    More Hispanic formation and lay leadership programs 59%
    Hispanic language and cultural education for priests and diocesan personnel 47%
    More Hispanic priests and pastoral workers assigned to Hispanics 26%
    Youth ministry 23%
    Base communities and RENEW 21%
    Evangelization and outreach to newcomers and lapsed Catholics 19%
    Media programs 7%
    Improved guidance for charismatic renewal and Cursillos 7%
    Vocational retreats and discernment 6%
    Popular religiosity 6%
    Community organizing/social justice 4%
    Legalization and other social services. 4%

    *Respondents were free to list more than one area.


    C. Statistical Information of Hispanic Presence

    Top 25 Dioceses Ranked by Hispanic Population in 1996

    (Rank in 1990)

    Diocese Hispanic Population Rank in 1990
    1 . LOS ANGELES
    2. MIAMI
    3. NEW YORK
    4. GALVESTON-HOUSTON
    5. SAN ANTONIO
    6. SAN BERNARDINO
    7. BROOKLYN
    8. CHICAGO
    9. FRESNO
    10. SAN DIEGO
    11. BROWNSVILLE
    12. ORANGE
    13. EL PASO
    14. PHOENIX
    15. CORPUS CHRISTI
    16. NEWARK
    17. DALLAS
    18. TUCSON
    19. SAN JOSE
    20. SANTA FE
    21. SACRAMENTO
    22. AUSTIN
    23. OAKLAND
    24. DENVER
    25. FORT WORTH
    4273955
    1292692
    1232312
    1014263
    978948
    965414
    950885
    895533
    844606
    768493
    768193
    734569
    541287
    530394
    497335
    473063
    463197
    410996
    397149
    384767
    383663
    366321
    350622
    349721
    279437
    (1)
    (3)
    (2)
    (6)
    (5)
    (8)
    (4)
    (7)
    (9)
    (11)
    (10)
    (12)
    (13)
    (16)
    (15)
    (14)
    (17)
    (20)
    (19)
    (18)
    (21)
    (24)
    (23)
    (22)
    (25)


    Top 20 Dioceses Ranked by Hispanic Population Growth, 1990-1996

    Diocese Population Increase % Increase
    LOS ANGELES
    SAN BERNARDINO
    FRESNO
    GALVESTON-HOUSTON
    MIAMI
    SAN DIEGO
    BROWNSVILLE
    ORANGE
    PHOENIX
    CHICAGO
    NEW YORK
    BROOKLYN
    DALLAS
    RENO-LAS VEGAS
    SACRAMENTO
    AUSTIN
    TUCSON
    EL PASO
    CORPUS CHRISTI
    SAN JOSE
    647565
    279322
    240055
    233036
    221255
    185773
    173896
    169726
    163385
    162767
    143410
    107343
    104278
    101631
    100306
    98149
    97906
    95872
    90546
    82584
    17.9
    40.7
    39.7
    29.8
    20.7
    31.9
    29.3
    30.0
    44.5
    22.2
    13.2
    12.7
    29.1
    81.7
    35.4
    36.6
    31.3
    21.5
    22.3
    26.3
    Total 3498805
    Percent of Total
    US Hispanic Increase: 61.1%


    Top 25 Dioceses Ranked by Percentage Increase in Hispanic Population Growth, 1990-1996

    (Minimum of 25,000 Hispanics in 1990)

    Diocese % Increase Absolute Increase (Rank)
    CHARLOTTE
    RENO-LAS VEGAS
    ATLANTA
    RALEIGH
    PORTLAND (OR)
    SAVANNAH
    BOISE
    SEATTLE
    VENICE
    ORLANDO
    PALM BEACH
    YAKIMA
    SPOKANE
    ROCKFORD
    PHOENIX
    JOLIET
    SALT LAKE CITY
    ARLINGTON
    ST. PAUL-MINNEAPOLIS
    COLORADO SPRINGS
    SAN BERNARDINO
    FRESNO
    ST. PETERSBURG
    RICHMOND
    AUSTIN
    84.3
    81.7
    80.1
    71.4
    59.2
    55.6
    53.0
    51.7
    51.1
    51.1
    49.3
    47.6
    47.6
    45.1
    44.5
    44.0
    43.8
    41.5
    41.5
    41.1
    40.7
    39.7
    38.8
    36.9
    36.6
    22735
    101631 (14)
    59082
    35558
    53187
    19545
    28049
    56782
    36061
    77252
    41121
    34398
    15460
    31105
    163385 (9)
    26279
    37044
    44158
    15746
    16584
    279322 (2)
    240055 (3)
    54669
    19906
    98149 (16)


    Hispanic Population Growth, 1990-1996
    (By Episcopal Region)

    Episcopal
    Region
    1990
    Pop.
    1996
    Pop.
    Pct
    Increase
    Pct. of
    1990
    Pct. of
    1996
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    12
    13
    577828
    2213977
    980029
    2124715
    201412
    341553
    1092962
    63781
    2105332
    3951917
    7854853
    408604
    2239399
    702170
    2533105
    1217469
    2851829
    256207
    414445
    1385366
    89451
    292892
    5054115
    9950706
    614432
    2844884
    21.5
    14.4
    24.2
    34.2
    27.2
    21.3
    26.8
    40.2
    42.6
    27.9
    26.5
    50.4
    27.0
    2.6
    9.9
    4.4
    9.5
    0.9
    1.5
    4.9
    0.3
    0.9
    17.7
    35.3
    1.8
    10.1
    2.5
    9.0
    4.3
    10.1
    0.9
    1.5
    4.9
    0.3
    1.0
    17.9
    35.3
    2.2
    10.1

    22266362 28207071 26.7 99.8 100.0


    Hispanic Population Growth, 1990-1996
    (By Diocese)

    Diocese 1990 1996 1990-96 %+
    ALBANY
    ALEXANDRIA
    ALLENTOWN
    ALTOONA
    AMARILLO
    ANCHORAGE
    ARLINGTON
    ATLANTA
    AUSTIN
    BAKER
    BALTIMORE
    BATON ROUGE
    BEAUMONT
    BELLEVILLE
    BILOXI
    BIRMINGHAM
    BISMARCK
    BOISE
    BOSTON
    BRIDGEPORT
    BROOKLYN
    BROWNSVILLE
    BUFFALO
    BURLINGTON
    CAMDEN
    CHARLESTON
    CHARLOTTE
    CHEYENNE
    CHICAGO
    CINCINNATI
    CLEVELAND
    COLORADO SPRINGS
    COLUMBUS
    CORPUS CHRISTI
    COVINGTON
    CROOKSTON
    DALLAS
    DAVENPORT
    DENVER
    DES MOINES
    DETROIT
    DODGE CITY
    DUBUQUE
    DULUTH
    EL PASO
    ERIE
    EVANSVILLE
    FAIRBANKS
    FALL RIVER
    FARGO
    FORT WAYNE-SO. BEND
    FORT WORTH
    FRESNO
    GALLUP
    GALVESTON-HOUSTON
    GARY
    GAYLORD
    GRAND ISLAND
    GRAND RAPIDS
    GREAT FALLS-BILLINGS
    GREEN BAY
    GREENSBURG
    HARRISBURG
    HARTFORD
    HELENA
    HONOLULU
    HOUMA-THIBODAUX
    INDIANAPOLIS
    JACKSON
    JEFFERSON CITY
    JOLIET
    JUNEAU
    KALAMAZOO
    KANSAS CITY (KS)
    KANSAS CITY (MO)
    KNOXVILLE
    LA CROSSE
    LAS CRUCES
    LAFAYETTE (IN)
    LAFAYETTE (LA)
    LAKE CHARLE'S
    LANSING
    LEXINGTON
    LINCOLN
    LITTLE ROCK
    LOS ANGELES
    LOUISVILLE
    LUBBOCK
    MADISON
    MANCHESTER
    MARQUETTE
    MEMPHIS
    METUCHEN
    MIAMI
    MILWAUKEE
    MOBILE
    MONTEREY
    NASHVILLE
    NEWARK
    NEW ORLEANS
    NEW ULM
    NEW YORK
    NORWICH
    OAKLAND
    OGDENSBURG
    OKLAHOMA CITY
    OMAHA
    ORANGE
    ORLANDO
    OWENSBORO
    PALM BEACH
    PATERSON
    PENSACOLA-TALL.
    PEORIA
    PHILADELPHIA
    PHOENIX
    PITTSBURGH
    PORTLAND (ME)
    PORTLAND(OR)
    PROVIDENCE
    PUEBLO
    RALEIGH
    RAPID CITY
    RENO-LAS VEGAS
    RICHMOND
    ROCHESTER
    ROCKFORD
    ROCKVILLE CENTRE
    SACRAMENTO
    SAGINAW
    ST. AUGUSTINE
    ST. CLOUD
    ST. PAUL-MINNEAPOLIS
    ST. PETERSBURG
    SALINA
    SALT LAKE CITY
    SAN ANGELO
    SAN ANTONIO
    SAN BERNARDINO
    SAN DIEGO
    SAN FRANCISCO
    SAN JOSE
    SANTA FE
    SANTA ROSA
    SAVANNAH
    SCRANTON
    SEATTLE
    SHREVEPORT
    SIOUX CITY
    SIOUX FALLS
    SPOKANE
    SPRINGFIELD-CAPE GIR.
    SPRINGFIELD (IL)
    SPRINGFIELD (MA)
    STEUBENVILLE
    STOCKTON
    SUPERIOR
    SYRACUSE
    TOLEDO
    TRENTON
    TUCSON
    TULSA
    TYLER
    VENICE
    VICTORIA
    WASHINGTON, DC
    WHEELING-CHARLES.
    WICHITA
    WILMINGTON
    WINONA
    WORCESTER
    YAKIMA
    YOUNGSTOWN
    21292
    7026
    44957
    3456
    66193
    12705
    106504
    73793
    268172
    22933
    24893
    10081
    21850
    4616
    6339
    13695
    1802
    52927
    186663
    70820
    843542
    594297
    31737
    3661
    77909
    30500
    26974
    25752
    732766
    17095
    52818
    40382
    14025
    406789
    1665
    3105
    358919
    12256
    277673
    8883
    84244
    23165
    7134
    2076
    445415
    5568
    2171
    3521
    25609
    2839
    19340
    205779
    604551
    71834
    781227
    50328
    2904
    13246
    31667
    6688
    5971
    2345
    35280
    124483
    5487
    81396
    30363
    16399
    9812
    6580
    59778
    1577
    16551
    34597
    28584
    9252
    4357
    175324
    10551
    6309
    3279
    41811
    6350
    6181
    19876
    3626390
    8848
    124165
    9928
    11333
    1663
    9710
    73484
    1071437
    71456
    10934
    212085
    13780
    398801
    54054
    3207
    1088902
    17813
    272941
    8519
    63449
    17542
    564843
    151039
    5142
    83491
    128706
    21165
    27385
    121010
    367009
    12170
    6829
    89775
    45755
    106254
    49771
    3459
    124408
    53899
    36612
    69011
    165242
    283357
    22757
    35460
    1807
    37963
    140952
    7858
    84597
    158849
    793034
    686092
    585720
    233275
    314565
    332069
    76445
    35140
    7506
    109809
    8553
    4370
    1793
    32475
    6885
    7420
    51922
    2253
    200208
    1485
    18131
    40869
    68839
    313090
    22247
    48114
    70604
    67071
    121802
    8487
    28051
    18804
    5730
    32940
    72284
    12896
    26916
    7760
    59349
    4515
    84074
    16166
    150652
    132875
    366321
    34675
    34783
    12244
    30594
    6113
    8763
    20015
    2408
    80976
    226286
    85044
    950885
    768193
    39701
    5704
    100433
    40771
    49709
    27637
    895533
    21005
    63045
    56966
    17953
    497335
    2297
    4218
    463197
    18379
    349721
    14393
    102114
    30068
    10696
    2859
    541287
    7623
    2933
    4414
    32847
    3935
    26344
    279437
    844606
    87038
    1014263
    63324
    3643
    21339
    40302
    7948
    8556
    3486
    48256
    145237
    6789
    92764
    35952
    22383
    11785
    8313
    86057
    1715
    20156
    46993
    36049
    15101
    6089
    206280
    14247
    7906
    4676
    50749
    8477
    10771
    40852
    4273955
    11297
    145043
    14034
    15852
    2028
    14413
    98014
    1292692
    91531
    15842
    256138
    23307
    473063
    62991
    4432
    1232312
    22248
    350622
    11056
    84772
    31366
    734569
    228291
    6587
    124612
    161179
    33540
    35186
    142256
    530394
    15714
    8471
    142256
    59089
    128157
    85329
    4633
    226039
    73805
    45918
    100116
    204193
    383663
    26742
    53284
    2759
    53709
    195621
    9952
    121641
    189403
    978948
    965414
    768493
    284472
    397149
    384767
    102917
    54685
    10953
    166591
    10101
    6397
    2759
    47935
    9357
    10849
    60526
    2382
    268190
    2071
    22124
    48805
    92628
    410996
    30264
    63858
    106665
    81419
    157581
    10012
    38819
    26922
    7739
    40866
    106682
    15521
    5624
    734
    14392
    1059
    17881
    3461
    44158
    59082
    98149
    11742
    9890
    2163
    8744
    1497
    2424
    6320
    606
    28049
    39623
    14224
    107343
    173896
    7964
    2043
    22524
    10271
    22735
    1885
    162767
    3910
    10227
    16584
    3928
    90546
    632
    1113
    104278
    6123
    72048
    5510
    17870
    6903
    3562
    783
    95872
    2055
    762
    893
    7238
    1096
    7004
    73658
    240055
    15204
    233036
    12996
    739
    8093
    8635
    1260
    2585
    1141
    12976
    20754
    1302
    11368
    5589
    5984
    1973
    1733
    26279
    138
    3505
    12396
    7465
    5849
    1732
    30956
    3696
    1597
    1397
    8938
    2127
    4509
    20976
    647565
    2449
    20878
    4106
    4519
    365
    4703
    4532
    221255
    20075
    4908
    44053
    9527
    74262
    8937
    1225
    143410
    4435
    77681
    2537
    21323
    13824
    169726
    77252
    1445
    41121
    32473
    12375
    7801
    21246
    163385
    3544
    1642
    53187
    13334
    21903
    35558
    1174
    101631
    19906
    9306
    31105
    38951
    100306
    3985
    17824
    952
    15746
    54669
    2094
    37044
    30554
    185914
    279322
    185773
    51197
    82584
    52698
    26472
    19545
    3447
    56782
    1548
    2027
    966
    15460
    2472
    3429
    8604
    129
    67982
    586
    3993
    7936
    23789
    97906
    8017
    15744
    36061
    14348
    35779
    1525
    10768
    8118
    2009
    7926
    34398
    2625
    26.4
    10.4
    32.0
    30.6
    27.0
    27.2
    41.5
    80.1
    36.6
    51.2
    39.7
    21.5
    40.0
    32.4
    38.2
    46.1
    33.6
    53.0
    21.2
    20.1
    12.7
    29.3
    25.1
    55.8
    28.9
    33.7
    84.3
    7.3
    22.2
    22.9
    19.4
    41.1
    28.0
    22.3
    38.0
    35.8
    29.1
    50.0
    25.9
    62.0
    21.2
    29.8
    49.9
    37.7
    21.5
    36.9
    35.1
    25.4
    28.3
    38.6
    36.2
    35.8
    39.7
    21.2
    29.8
    25.8
    25.4
    61.1
    27.3
    18.8
    43.3
    48.7
    36.8
    16.7
    23.7
    14.0
    18.4
    36.5
    20.1
    26.3
    44.0
    8.8
    21.8
    35.8
    26.1
    63.2
    39.8
    17.7
    35.0
    25.3
    42.6
    21.4
    33.5
    74.3
    105.5
    17.9
    27.7
    16.8
    41.4
    39.9
    21.9
    48.4
    33.4
    20.7
    28.1
    44.9
    20.8
    69.1
    18.6
    16.5
    38.2
    13.2
    24.9
    28.5
    29.8
    33.6
    78.8
    30.0
    51.1
    28.1
    49.3
    25.5
    58.5
    28.5
    17.6
    44.5
    29.1
    24.0
    59.2
    29.1
    20.6
    71.4
    33.9
    81.7
    36.0
    25.4
    45.1
    23.6
    35.4
    17.5
    50.3
    52.7
    41.5
    38.8
    26.6
    43.8
    19.2
    23.4
    40.7
    31.9
    21.9
    26.3
    15.9
    34.6
    55.6
    45.9
    51.7
    18.1
    46.4
    53.9
    47.6
    35.9
    46.2
    16.6
    5.7
    34.0
    39.5
    22.0
    19.4
    34.6
    31.3
    36.0
    32.7
    51.1
    21.4
    29.4
    18.0
    38.4
    43.2
    35.1
    24.1
    47.6
    20.4

    Note: The 1990 data presented in the following tables is based on the actual population count and the statistical sampling that were conducted during the 1990 Census. It is well known that large numbers of Hispanics, especially recent immigrants, did not participate in this count. The 1996 data is based on statistical estimates produced each year by the U.S. Census Bureau. These estimates are compiled using a sophisticated mathematical formula that factors in expected rates of immigration and fertility among the Hispanic population in each County.

    Estimates of the percentage of Hispanics who are identified as Catholic are from two sources: The General Social Survey, as tabulated by te National Opinion Research Center in Chicago: and telephone surveys conducted by Strategy Research Corporation. Estimates for Catholic population growth due to Hispanics since 1960 (71%) and the current percentage of Catholics who are Hispanic (30%) are presented in the Hispanic Market 1994, published by Strategy Research Corporation, and are based on 1990 data. A higher estimate of 38% based on 1992 data is presented in Hispanic Americans: A Statistical Source book (1998).


    Main Survey Respondents: Diocesan Directors Survey

    ALBANY
    ALEXANDRIA
    ANCHORAGE
    ARLINGTON
    ATLANTA
    AUSTIN
    BAKER
    BALTIMORE
    BATON ROUGE
    BEAUMONT
    BIRMINGHAM
    BISMARCK*
    BRIDGEPORT
    BROOKLYN
    BUFFALO
    BURLINGTON*
    CHARLESTON
    CHARLOTTE
    CHICAGO
    CINCINNATI
    CLEVELAND
    COLORADO SPRINGS
    COVINGTON
    CROOKSTON
    DALLAS
    DENVER
    DES MOINES
    DETROIT
    DUBUQUE
    DULUTH
    ERIE
    EVANSVILLE
    FORT WAYNE-SO. BEND
    FORT WORTH
    GRAND ISLAND
    GRAND RAPIDS
    GREAT FALLS-BILLINGS
    GREEN BAY
    GREENSBURG*
    HARRISBURG
    HONOLULU
    JACKSON
    JEFFERSON CITY
    JOLIET
    JUNEAU
    KALAMAZOO
    KANSAS CITY, KS
    KANSAS CITY, MO
    KNOXVILLE
    LA CROSSE
    LAS CRUCES
    LAFAYETTE, IN
    LAFAYETTE, LA
    LAKE CHARLES
    LITTLE ROCK
    LOS ANGELES
    LUBBOCK
    MADISON
    MANCHESTER
    MIAMI
    MILWAUKEE
    MOBILE
    MONTEREY
    NASHVILLE
    NEWARK
    NEW ORLEANS
    NEW ULM
    NORWICH
    OAKLAND
    OGDENSBURG
    OKLAHOMA CITY
    OMAHA
    ORANGE
    ORLANDO
    PALM BEACH
    PATERSON
    PENSACOLA
    PEORIA
    PHILADELPHIA
    PHOENIX
    PORTLAND, ME
    PROVIDENCE
    PUEBLO
    RALEIGH
    RAPID CITY
    RICHMOND
    ROCKFORD
    SAGINAW
    ST. AUGUSTINE
    ST. LOUIS
    ST. PETERSBURG
    SALT LAKE CITY
    SAN ANGELO
    SAN ANTONIO
    SAN BERNARDINO
    SAN DIEGO
    SAN JOSE
    SANTA FE
    SAVANNAH
    SCRANTON
    SHREVEPORT
    SIOUX FALLS
    SPOKANE
    SPRINGFIELD, MO
    SPRINGFIELD, IL
    STOCKTON
    SYRACUSE
    TOLEDO
    TUCSON
    VENICE
    WASHINGTON, DC
    WILMINGTON
    WINONA
    WORCESTER
    YAKIMA


    115
    Surveys Returned

    3
    Surveys Invalid

    112
    Valid Participants

    * No Hispanic Ministry Office


    Secondary Survey Respondents
    Total = 24 Dioceses

    (Respondents to Shortened Survey Administered by Telephone

    ALLENTOWN
    AMARILLO
    BILOXI
    BOSTON
    BROWNSVILLE
    COLUMBUS
    CORPUS CHRISTI
    EL PASO
    FRESNO
    GALVESTON-HOUSTON
    HARTFORD
    INDIANAPOLIS
    LANSING
    LINCOLN
    LOUISVILLE
    METUCHEN
    NEW YORK
    OWENSBORO
    PITTSBURGH
    ROCKVILLE CENTRE
    SEATTLE
    TULSA
    VICTORIA
    WHEELING-CHARLESTON


    Survey Non-Responses
    Total = 15 Dioceses

    CAMDEN
    DAVENPORT
    DOGE CITY
    LAS VEGAS
    LEXINGTON
    MEMPHIS
    PITTSBURGH
    PORTLAND, OR
    SACRAMENTO
    SAN FRANCISCO
    SANTA ROSA
    SIOUX CITY
    TRENTON
    TYLER
    YOUNGSTOWN

    Sampling Universe = 150 Dioceses

    Primary Response Rate: 75% (112 Dioceses)

    Secondary Response Rate: 91% (136 Dioceses)

Email us at hispanicaffairs@usccb.org
Secretariat for Hispanic Affairs | 3211 4th Street, N.E., Washington DC 20017-1194 | (202) 541-3000 © USCCB. All rights reserved.


Email us at scha@usccb.org
Hispanic Affairs | 3211 4th Street, N.E., Washington DC 20017-1194 | (202) 541-3150 © USCCB. All rights reserved.