|
|
The Living Light
Spring 2000
Volume 36-Number 3
Excerpts from the Spring 2000 Issue
SPECIAL FEATURE -- Cathechesis for and in Marriage
Table of Contents
SPECIAL FEATURE -- Catechesis for and in Marriage
Life Together: A Catechesis of Marriage as Sacrament
Michael G. Lawler
Marriage Preparation Programs: Are They Working?
Robert A. Ruhnke
Interchurch Families and the Quest for Unity
Ray and Fenella Temmerman
Planning Interfaith Weddings
Gordon E. Truitt
Forgiveness and Reconciliation in Marriage
Mario Barbero
Articles
The Bottom Line of Youth Ministry: Fostering Self-Esteem
Michael Warren
Resources for Family Peacemaking
James and Kathleen McGinnis
Review Essay
The Story Is in the Telling
Robert Béla Wilhelm
Book Reviews
Schaper, Donna E. Raising Interfaith Children: Spiritual Orphans or Spiritual Heirs?
(rev. by Mary Helene Rosenbaum)
Shivanandan, Mary. Crossing the Threshold of Love: A New Vision of Marriage
(rev. by Patrick J. Hayes)
Palmer, Parker. The Courage to Teach: Exploring the Inner Landscape of a Teacher's Life
(rev. by Leona English)
Lee, James Michael. The Sacrament of Teaching, Volume One: A Personal Treatment/A Social Science Approach
(rev. by Padraic O'Hare)
Senn, Frank C. A Stewardship of the Mysteries
(rev. by Anne Marie Mongoven)
Warren, Michael. Seeing Through the Media: A Religious View of Communications and Cultural Analysis
(rev. by David F. White)
Espín, Orlando O., and Miguel H. Díaz, eds. From the Heart of Our People: Latino/a Explorations in Catholic Systematic Theology
(rev. by Oswald John Nira)
Moltmann, Jürgen. The Coming of God: Christian Eschatology
(rev. by Peter C. Phan)
New and Noteworthy
Leckey: Blessings All Around Us: Savoring God's Gifts
Knight: Living God's Word: Reflections on the Weekly Gospels—Year B
Davis: Don't Know Much About the Bible: Everything You Need to Know
About the Good Book but Never Learned
Deats: Martin Luther King, Jr.: Spirit-Led Prophet
Costello: A Prayerbook for Catechists
Ayer: Guided Meditations on Images of God: Mother, Potter, Compassion, Love
Farry: A Single Mother's Prayerbook
Koch: A Popular History of the Catholic Church
O'Donnell: A Faith You Can Live With: Understanding the Basics
Kaster: Parish Faith Formation Assessment and Planning Tool
Canon Law Society of America: Code of Canon Law: Latin-English
Edition (New English Translation)
Halton: The Human Couple in the Fathers
Fodor's Travel Publications: Fodor's Holy Rome: A Millennium Guide to the Christian Sights
Departments
Editor's Foreword
Calendar
Department of Education News
Guidelines for Contributors
Editor's Forward
(This is the Editor's Foreword by Berard L. Marthaler from The Living Light Spring 2000, Vol. 36, No. 3. Subscribe to The Living Light.)
A Sign of Commitment, Fidelity, Unity, and Anticipation
The articles in this issue of The Living Light have a common theme. In one way or another, all suggest that catechesis for adults should help couples—those preparing for marriage and those already married—to reflect on marriage as a sacrament. Some years ago, Ronald Knox advanced the notion that marriage illustrates the sacramental principle better than any other rite, with the possible exception of eucharist. In its broadest sense, a sacrament is a visible sign of an invisible reality. The sacramental principle suggests that there is more to human actions and words than meets the eye and ear. At a conference on the sacraments, as reprinted in his book The Hidden Stream, Knox proposed that nothing better exemplifies this notion of sacrament than marriage, where the physical and natural witness to the spiritual and supernatural.
It was not by chance, he contends, that the Church's understanding of marriage is opposed by movements that attack the Christian vision of creation and life. At one extreme are the Manicheans and others in the gnostic tradition who hold that all matter is evil. They undermine the sacramental system based on the principle that the visible and tangible, the historical and social, mediate the presence of God in the world. For them, the idea that sexual intercourse might be a good is unthinkable. At the other extreme are crass materialists who question the sacramental character of marriage because they cannot recognize any dimension of reality not apparent to the senses. The best they can say for marriage is that it is a social institution established to ensure stable relationships and the perpetuation of the human species.
Nothing is more natural than the mating instinct in human beings. In the eyes of the casual observer, marriage is a human act, but the person of faith understands it to have a deeper meaning. The wedding vows, public statements of intent, commit the spouses to an unconditional sharing of their lives. The Bible dignifies marriage by using it to illustrate the lasting covenant between God and his people. The New Testament cites the relationship between Christ and his Church as the model for the relationship between husband and wife. The Epistle to the Ephesians, referencing Genesis, says that "for this reason a man shall leave [his] father and [his] mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh" (Eph 5:31). The sacrament of marriage affirms that human love and commits the spouses to accepting responsibility to and for one another and their offspring.
The New Testament uses marriage to illustrate other facets of Christ's mission in the world. Many texts in the Old Testament use a wedding feast to symbolize the messianic age (e.g., Is 54:4-8; 62:4-5). Fr. Raymond E. Brown's commentary on the Gospel of John explains that the dramatic gesture by which Jesus changed water into wine at the wedding feast of Cana signaled the beginning of a new era. Indeed, on several occasions, Jesus cited wedding customs to illustrate his teaching about the messianic kingdom. In the parable of the ten virgins, for example, he instructed his disciples to be patient in their watchfulness so as to be prepared for the coming of the bridegroom (Mt 25:1-12).
Eschatological expectation—waiting for the coming of the Lord—is an essential element of Christian life. The eucharist "proclaims the death of the Lord until he comes" (1 Cor 11:26), and the Church in turn regards the eucharist as the joyful anticipation of the wedding feast that a king prepared for his son (Mt 22:1-14; Lk 14:16-24). Weddings and eucharistic celebrations are festive occasions. They celebrate love: the love of Christ for his Church, the universal love of God for all people, and the love that bonds the members of Christ's body to one another. In bonding people to one another, marriage, like the eucharist, creates unity and thereby becomes an expression of what it signifies. Each of these sacraments, while in its own way bringing the kingdom into being, anticipates the coming of that kingdom when love will be boundless and ecstasy endless. §
Life Together: A Catechesis
of Marriage as Sacrament
[This excerpt is from the article Life Together: A Catechesis of Marriage as Sacrament, by Michael Lawler, The Living Light Spring 2000, Vol. 36, No. 3. Subscribe to The Living Light.]
Steps taken by a couple before marriage are an important key to the success of their marriage. A national study of marriage preparation conducted in 1995 by the Center for Marriage and Family at Creighton University showed that almost two-thirds (66.3 percent) of those who participated in marriage preparation programs found the experience valuable.1 Marriage preparation should, therefore, receive the support of churches because it stabilizes and enhances marriage and family. There is, however, a caveat: The perceived value of marriage preparation was highest in the first year of marriage and diminished after that. The decrease becomes more rapid as the spouses pass their fourth anniversary. Marriage preparation has a restricted shelf-life and must be supported with booster shots as the years progress and the circumstances of the spouses change.
*******************************************
An overview of the Christian understanding of marriage is found in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC). The Catechism has much to say about marriage and family life, but it does not pretend to provide an academic treatise on the sacrament. The picture that emerges is more like a quilt that is pieced together. To get a comprehensive picture of the Church's teaching, one must sew together pieces scattered throughout the text. Each part of the Catechism—with the exception of the fourth (though even this last part has sections on forgiveness that can be included in marital spirituality)—provides insight and information important to a theology of marriage and helpful in marriage catechesis.
In the first part, the Catechism sketches the main lines of salvation history—the main tenets of a Christian anthropology based on the notion of creation, fall, and re-creation. It is in this framework that the basis of the Christian theology of marriage emerges. In part two of the Catechism, the scriptural basis for marriage is complemented by liturgical, theological, and canonical aspects of marriage as sacrament. A discussion of sexual morals in part three gives special attention to the sixth commandment and provides foundations for the bonds of married love.
Beginning with a discussion of Genesis 2:7 and 22, the first part of the Catechism speaks about the fundamental dignity of each of the sexes. Men and women are to be honored as created persons mapped out in God's image, "reflect[ing] the Creator's wisdom and goodness" (CCC, no. 369). These women and men even reflect, though imperfectly, the numerous perfections of God (CCC, no. 370). High praise, indeed! Read through the lens of the Genesis account, the Catechism illumines certain principles that flow through Genesis's presentation of marriage.
Equality, then, must be part of the divine plan for human salvation and in fact reflects back upon God's perfect love for humanity. Neither sex has sole possession of the ability to reflect these perfections. Their fundamental equality stems from the recognition that each is "hard-wired" in such a way as to offer unique gifts to the other person, so difference is in the mix. Their equality is further recognized, given the Genesis account, by the fact that "man discovers woman as another ‘I,' sharing the same humanity" (CCC, no. 371). These two realities, difference and sameness, form an understanding that should yield harmony between the sexes in terms of their original dignity in God's sight.
These passages do not propose that the equality of the sexes is absolute. Obviously there are things that women and men cannot share in equally—childbearing being an instance of this. Talents peculiar to each must be fostered and encouraged. These may or may not depend on those cultural or social characteristics that contribute to the development of men and women, but they cannot be discounted either. It is more important that the sexes recognize abilities and interests of each other as persons rather than as women and men, two categories whose traditional distinctions have become rather blurred. This is a matter of establishing justice in relationships, where one says to the other, "you are not like me, but this leads me to respect and appreciate you." Once this catechesis on the sexes is undertaken with couples, it will be easier to lead them through the other aspects of marriage preparation.
Again the Catechism continues the creation story. Genesis is not simply about the consequences of the fall. It also offers a sign of hope that stems from the unity of the sexes. "Man and woman were made ‘for each other'—not that God left them half-made and incomplete: he created them to be a communion of persons" (CCC, no. 372). What does it mean to be a "communion of persons"? How does that translate into practice? How does that practice work itself out in situations of inner-city violence or dire poverty, itself a form of violence? To be in communion is to be about the work of mission. Mission entails caring for the other, moving beyond the personal boundaries of oneself to see to the needs of the other. A culture of care, created before a marriage, cemented at the banns, and nurtured through the whole of life, is precisely what a "communion of persons" means. It means hard work, dedication, and loyalty. It means building a future. It gives shape to a couple's response, through the witness of their lives together, to the consequences of the fall. Sin and death are never victorious when a couple acts as a communion of persons. Faithful spouses return to paradise.
Married life is a specially graced state of human existence, one the Church has called a sacrament. Part two of the Catechism, which expands on part one insofar as it situates marriage in the order of creation, focuses on marriage as a covenant and sacrament. This is the most extensive section on marriage (CCC, nos. 1601-1666). The Catechism reiterates that "the vocation to marriage is written in the very nature of man and woman as they came from the hand of the Creator" (CCC, no. 1603). Two things about this are immediately striking. First, divine authorship of marriage is paramount. Couples need assurance that God is working in the midst of their married life and that they themselves are cooperating in the grace bestowed upon them. Second, the vocation to married life is of equal value to men and women. Again, the importance of equality cannot be downplayed. Only out of this kind of radical parity can marriage be understood.
************************************
Pius XI retrieved and gave prominence to the notion of marriage as an interpersonal union of marital love and intimacy. Marital love, he taught, does not consist "in pleasing words only, but in the deep attachment of the heart [will] which is expressed in action, since love is proved by deeds." This love "must have as its primary purpose that man [sic] and wife help each other
day by day . . . [to] . . . grow in true love towards God and their neighbor."2 Europe, recovering from one devastating war and preparing for another, was ready for such a personalist approach, and the pope's lead was taken up by two German thinkers, Dietrich Von Hildebrand and Heribert Doms. Both argued that biological materialism, which saw the human as simply a highly developed animal (based on the 1917 Code's definition), resulted in a destructive anti-personalism. Conjugal love, or conjugal union, is the primary end of marriage, they argued, though this conjugal union tends naturally to the birth and nurture of children who fulfill their parents both as individuals and as a coupled two-in-oneness. Though this approach was condemned by the Holy Office in 19443 and again by Pope Pius XII in 1951,4 it ultimately bore fruit in the Second Vatican Council's pastoral constitution Gaudium et spes.
Marriage, the council taught in this constitution, is a "community of love . . . an intimate partnership of life and . . . love" (GS, nos. 47-48). The mutual love of the spouses (as well as their desire to be best friends for life) is the very essence of marriage. Marriage is "rooted in the contract of its partners, that is, in their irrevocable personal consent" (GS, no. 48). The council fathers noted that "marriage was not instituted solely for the procreation of children: its nature as an indissoluble covenant between two people and the good of the children demand that the mutual love of the partners be properly expressed, that it should grow and mature" (GS, no. 50).
***********************************
Despite these difficulties, the council fathers saw in marriages the image of God's covenant with Israel and Christ's love and fidelity for the Church. The word "covenant," adorned with biblical nuance, is a more personal word that "contract." It encompasses both the "gift-receipt" and "mutual surrender" aspects of a contract but humanizes the meaning of these terms insofar as it removes any sense of "bargaining" or "erasure of the self." The interpersonal character of the covenant is underscored by the council's refusal of the "primary end-secondary end" terminology. Rather, the council insisted that the interpersonal union of the spouses is an end of marriage equal to the procreation of children. Marriage is for the good of the spouses, a good that renews itself with each passing day.
**********************************
To covenant is to commit oneself radically and solemnly (cf. CCC, no. 1623). When Christian spouses covenant in marriage, they commit themselves mutually to a life of equal partnership in steadfast love. To covenant in Christian marriage demands not only the creation of a life of equal partnership but also the sustaining of that life. Sustenance of a marriage leads to its indissoluble character, which is an important theme in part two of the Catechism (cf. CCC, nos. 1603, 1605, 1610-1611, 1614-1616, 1641, 1643-1644, 1649, 1661, 1664). Believing Christians will find suggestions for sustaining their marriage, for instance, in a careful reading of the Letter to the Ephesians. There the author critiques the list of household duties accepted in first-century Mediterranean culture and the different attitudes toward the status of men and women and their functions in society. The letter invites all Christians to "be subordinate to one another out of reverence for Christ" (Eph 5:21). The critique both challenges the absolute authority of any Christian over any other, including that of a husband over a wife, and establishes the basic attitude required of all Christians: an awe of Christ and a giving way to one another because of it.
The challenge is that "the husband is head of his wife" in the same way that "Christ is head of the church" (Eph 5:23). The question that arises is immediately answered: How is Christ head of the church? "He handed himself over for her" (Eph 5:25). There is an echo here of Mark's description of Jesus, who "did not come to be served but to serve" (Mk 10:45). This reverberates further in what Jesus constantly tried to teach to his power-hungry disciples. In the reign of God, the head is the one who serves (Lk 22:26).
**************************************
To covenant is to commit mutually to explore the religious depth of life together and to respond to that depth in light of a mutual covenant to Christ. "Divine love" is present to married couples in Christ because the couple's marriage is "integrated into God's covenant" with humanity (CCC, no. 1639; cf. no. 1642). A marriage that is to be sacramental or religious is not just a wedding to be celebrated. It is also, and more crucially, a life to be lived in equal and loving partnership. One way to describe the Christian life is to describe it as discipleship. "Disciple" is a gospel word, implying a call from Christ and a response from a believer. Disciples are learners, and disciples of Christ are learners of a triple mystery: the mystery of the God who calls them to love and to serve; the mystery of the Christ in whom this God is embodied and revealed; and the mystery of the Church in which Christ is embodied and which calls them to communion and service. The spouses are instructed about covenant marriage in the prayers of the wedding service: "Let them be living examples of Christian life. Give them the strength which comes from the gospels so that they may be witnesses of Christ to others." The union of the spouses, signified and enhanced in acts of love, including sexual love (cf. CCC, nos. 1643-1654), is the human medium of sacrament, the medium in which God offers himself as grace and believers freely accept this gift and offer the gift of themselves in return.
The theme of the Catechism's third part is "Life in Christ." It examines the nature and purpose of marriage in a number of contexts, but most specifically in the context of the commandments. The fourth commandment makes clear that "the conjugal community," grounded in the consent of the spouses, is the foundation of the family (CCC, nos. 2201-2203), itself "the original cell of social life." Society in turn has a particular responsibility "to support marriage and the family" (CCC, no. 2209).
**********************************
The classical Catholic definition of sacrament, "outward sign of inward grace," which took a thousand years to become established,6 can now be more fully explicated. A sacrament is a prophetic symbol in which the Church, the body of Christ in the world, reveals and celebrates in representation the presence and action of God, which is grace itself. To say that marriage is a sacrament is to say that it is a prophetic symbol, a reality with a double meaning. On one level, it reveals and celebrates the covenant union between a man and a woman. On another level, that union becomes a symbol revealing and celebrating the covenant union between Christ and Christ's Church. Every couple that enters marriage says, in one way or another, "I love you." Couples entering a Christian, covenantal, sacramental marriage say that too, and more. They say, "I love you as Christ loves us, steadfastly and faithfully." A sacramental marriage is more than a legal bond; it is also a religious covenant. It is more than a legal right; it is also grace. The presence of grace in its most ancient Christian sense, namely the presence of the gracious God, is not something extrinsic to sacramental marriage. It is something intrinsic to such a marriage, something without which it would not be sacramental marriage at all. In a truly sacramental marriage—the marriage between two believing Christians—the love of God and Christ provides the eschatological model of the love to which the spouses are to aspire. This is part of what the Catholic Church means when it teaches that marriage is graced and is, therefore, sacrament. In the present dire state of marriage and family in the United States, this demands to be made known to every Christian about to be married.§
Michael G. Lawler is the Amelia and Emil Graf Chair in Catholic Theological Studies and director of the Center for Marriage and Family at Creighton University.
- Center for Marriage and Family, Marriage Preparation in the Catholic Church: Getting it Right (Omaha, Neb.: Creighton University, 1995). For the marriage preparation of interchurch couples, see the center's Ministry to Interchurch Marriages: A National Study (Omaha, Neb.: Creighton University, 1999). Both publications may be ordered through the center's website: www.creighton.edu/MarriageandFamily.
- Gerald C. Treacy, ed., Five Great Encyclicals (New York: Paulist, 1939), 83-4.
- Acta Apostolicae Sedis 36 (1944), 103.
- Acta Apostolicae Sedis 43 (1951), 848-849.
- Additionally, there is the potential for confusion over the English translations of the official council documents currently in vogue. The Latin text reads: "Ita actu humano, quo coniuges sese mutuo tradunt atque accipiunt. . ." (GS, no. 48). The two principal English translators of the conciliar texts, Walter Abbott and Austin Flannery, give two different renderings of the consensual terms. Abbott's translation reads "bestow and accept," while Flannery uses the phrase "mutual surrender." I would render the Latin as follows: "The human action in which spouses give themselves to each other and accept each other. . . ."
- Cf. Michael G. Lawler, Symbol and Sacrament: A Contemporary Sacramental Theology (Omaha, Neb.: Creighton University, 1995), 29-34.
Marriage Preparation Programs:
Are They Working?
(This excerpt is from the article "Marriage Preparation Programs: Are They Working?" by Robert Ruhnke, The Living Light Spring 2000, Vol. 36, No. 3. Subscribe to The Living Light.)
Any polling of pastors and parochial ministers about important pastoral needs is likely to reveal that marriage preparation is extremely important. The pastor and parish staff commonly give considerable attention to couples preparing for Christian marriage. New programs claiming to be the best way to assist couples appear with some regularity. As we evaluate the various programs and approaches to marriage preparation now available, the rather brief history of this ministry is worth recalling.
************************************
Pastoral ministers have sought ways to help couples preparing for marriage to become aware of the inadequacy of their relationship skills. They found that adequate relationship skills include the psychological realities of effective communication and the willingness to listen and share. These skills also include faith realities, such as prayer, forgiveness, trust, and the ability to make and keep commitments. It is clear that many (most) couples who hope to be successful in Christian marriage need to learn more effective relationship skills. This effort to design better marriage preparation programs resulted in three distinct kinds of programs:
- FOCCUS (and similar programs). FOCCUS (Facilitating Open Couple Communication, Understanding, and Study) is a series of questions to which each person answers "agree," "disagree," or "unsure." The results of the survey are shared with the couple under the guidance of a facilitator. The goal is to highlight potential areas of weakness and encourage the couple to develop more effective ways of relating.
- "Engaged Encounter" (and similar programs). Engaged En-counter is a weekend retreat led by married couples who share their own stories and struggles of learning how to live in a Christian marriage. The goal is to provide real-life examples of how marriage can be done, as well as time for the engaged couple to do private sharing and planning free of the normal distractions of daily life.
- "Sponsor Couple Program" (and similar programs). The Sponsor Couple Program is a mentor process. The couple preparing for marriage first does their homework. They study the meaning of Christian marriage and the skills such a marriage will require. Then they meet with their "sponsors" in the home of the sponsor couple. This provides an opportunity for the sponsor couple to use their own experiences to affirm, coach, and even challenge the engaged couple to learn and practice more effective marriage skills.
In recent years, dioceses of the United States and Canada have established a pastoral process for assisting couples preparing for marriage. Typically, this includes an assessment process involving two or three meetings with the priest or deacon to verify the couple's "freedom to marry" in the Church and their psychological and spiritual readiness for Christian marriage.2 The hope is to establish enough of a relationship with the couple so that they will listen to the concerns of the Church about the need to assess their skills for building a sacramental marriage.
After the assessment, the couple participates in one or more preparation programs, such as Pre-Cana, Engaged Encounter, or Sponsor Couple Program. The goal of each of these programs, as outlined above, is to help the couple examine the content of what they have received from their family of origin and to determine whether they need to learn new, and perhaps radically different, skills for establishing and maintaining a sacramental marriage. Taking a course in Natural Family Planning is also highly recommended. Finally, the couple returns to the priest or deacon to plan the wedding ceremony. Many dioceses have made this kind of process a requirement for marriage in the Church.
***********************************
In trying to assess current needs, pastors struggle with three key pastoral problems.
Pastoral Problem #1: Lack of adequate and appropriate discernment. Diocesan policies direct couples to contact the parish six to twelve months prior to their desired wedding date so that marriage preparation programs can begin. The problem is that even if the couple contacts the pastor a year or more before they plan to marry, they have already made their decision to marry. Traditional marriage preparation programs are thus too late to help with this critical decision. Pastoral Problem #2: Lack of canon law information about "freedom to marry" and "mixed religion." The number of marriages in which at least one of the parties has been married before and/or is not Catholic is increasing. Many Catholics unwittingly plan to marry a previously married non-Catholic with the mistaken notion that because the previous marriage was not in the Catholic Church it was "not valid." Even if the couple approaches the pastor a year or more prior to their intended wedding, it is likely to be too late if either of them needs to go through the annulment process. In addition, mixed-religion couples need to know all the options and regulations of canon law (and local diocesan policies) before making decisions about the place of the wedding and the wedding ritual. Pastoral Problem #3: Lack of adequate time for the "conversion" that Christian marriage requires of the couple. Most couples in the United States are products of a culture that is highly materialistic, individualistic, and even anti-marriage. The desire to live Christian marriage requires radical lifestyle changes—that is, conversion of lifelong habits that are destructive of relationships and marriage.
The final hectic months before the wedding is not the best time for the kind of reflection and dialogue that could lead to radical personal change. The emotional high of a weekend retreat for engaged couples is not a bad thing, but it is rarely a reliable indication that radically new skills (e.g., forgiveness, marital dialogue, and prayer as a couple) have taken lasting root. The parish can be more effective by following a few simple principles of adult education and by offering resources designed to assist couples with the discernment process.
Effective marriage preparation starts by remembering that those preparing for marriage are adults, not children. While this may seem an obvious point, there is a reason to give this careful thought. Since so many of the educational efforts of the Catholic Church have been designed for children, parishes are still learning to incorporate the unique elements of adult education into the design of marriage preparation programs. When educating children, it is appropriate to determine for them what they must learn, and when and how they will learn it. Once a person becomes an adult, however, he or she is capable of directing his or her own ongoing formation and education, and he or she bears personal responsibility for all decisions made. Effective adult education incorporates this principle of personal responsibility.
**************************************
Strange as it may seem, we have not designed formal marriage preparation products for use when they are most needed—namely, while the couple is making their decision about getting married. Typically, the couple has gone through their own process of deciding to marry. Then they have informed their families, "hired the band," and called the parish to sign up the church. The parish has responded to this request by trying to get the couple to slow the planning process, to re-think their decisions about marriage, and perhaps to decide not to marry (or at least postpone the wedding). Needless to say, this is not an effective way to minister to adults.
The following parish efforts will encourage couples to make better, more informed decisions about marriage:
- Periodic pulpit announcements and weekly bulletin notices. Information from the pulpit by the pastor is a proven method of announcing and establishing new policies. In addition, the information can be printed in the bulletin as a weekly reminder: "Anyone who is even remotely thinking about marriage is encouraged to contact the parish office for a special packet of information. Please obtain this packet before you decide to get engaged!"4 Couples needing this information may not be regular churchgoers, so the goal is to inform family and friends, who can pass it on to couples they know. Parish secretaries can refer incoming calls about marriage to the pastor (or another person trained for this responsibility).
- Information Session: Preparing for Marriage. Parishes can provide evening sessions as often as needed. Single persons, dating couples, and engaged couples can be invited to a presentation of information about preparing for marriage in the Catholic Church, and such presentations present an opportunity for them to ask any questions.
- Publish helpful websites in the parish bulletin. This is a strategy for encouraging personal initiative and responsibility. One site that such a list could include is www.marriagepreparation.com, which offers information about marriage preparation and one's freedom to marry in the Catholic Church, and provides e-mail access to a pastoral minister who will answer personal questions about marriage preparation.§
Robert A. Ruhnke, CSSR, D.Min., is the author of For Better and For Ever and is engaged in pastoral work and marriage preparation in San Antonio, Texas.
- Cf. Center for Marriage and Family, Marriage Preparation in the Catholic Church: Getting it Right (Omaha, Neb.: Creighton University, 1995).
- The FOCCUS (or similar) instrument is typically used to help with this assessment process.
- There is a general impression that couples marrying in the Church today are doing better than the national average of 50 percent divorce rate. However, too many variables make it difficult to conclude that it is the programs themselves that are making this positive difference.
- A packet designed by this author, For Better and For Ever, can be mailed to the person or couple who needs it (or perhaps a parent or friend of the prospective bride and groom) by contacting Rev. Robert A. Ruhnke, CSSR, Marriage Preparation Resources, 1617 Iowa Street, San Antonio, TX 78203; phone (210) 534-1129; or on the web at www.marriagepreparation.com.
- Ibid.
Interchurch Families and the Quest for Unity
(This excerpt is from the article Interchurch Families and the Quest for Unity by Ray and Fenella Temmerman, The Living Light Spring 2000, Vol. 36, No. 3. Subscribe to The Living Light.]
When a man and a woman from two different Christian traditions fall in love and decide to marry, they begin the long journey of learning to live the unity of their love in the face of the scandal of the divided churches. Fenella and I embarked on such a journey eight years ago. We have found that the tensions caused by church division impact our daily lives, most clearly at the important celebrations—that is, marriage, baptism, confirmation of children, and above all eucharist, where the consequences of the scandal of separation are felt weekly.
Fenella was living in London at the time of our marriage. We made our home in a small community in the center of Canada and began worshiping together in the Catholic Church. I was already deeply involved in the Church, and Fenella was beginning to discover there a depth of liturgy and spirituality with which she felt comfortable. Additionally, Fenella's Anglican pastor suggested that it was more important that we worship together than that she worship in the Anglican tradition. We invited our Catholic pastor over for supper to talk about worship in the Catholic Church and especially about receiving the eucharist, something very important to both of us. His response was heartwarming: "Canonically this presents difficulties, but we need to deal with it on a pastoral level." As we had committed ourselves to living in the community for five years, he welcomed Fenella to participate in and receive communion for that period of time, by the end of which, he suggested, she should be able to discern where she wanted to make her spiritual home.
Life went on peacefully for a time. Then came a change of priests. This new pastor had a very different understanding and approach, telling Fenella repeatedly in their first meeting that "You don't understand. You're not one of us." We found ourselves in turmoil, wondering how we would be received from Sunday to Sunday, discovering that we were being talked about at parish council meetings and more. We began to cast around for ways to make sense of our experience and in the process were put in touch with the Association of Interchurch Families in England. We subscribed to their publication, Interchurch Families,1 and can remember bursting into tears as we read our first issue. Here were people around the world experiencing the same painful reality. We were no longer alone.
We were invited to Virginia Beach to attend the first international conference of interchurch families. There we met people from associations in England, Northern Ireland, France, and Italy. In addition, the Canadian and American Associations were formed at the conference. At the time, Fenella and I were living in a small Canadian community, miles away from any organized group, so we decided to use my computer skills and our new contacts to establish a website for interchurch families.2 That site now contains materials from the long-established groups—the British Association of Interchurch Families, the French Foyers Mixtes, and the German Konfessionsverbindender Paare und Familien—each of which were formed more than thirty years ago. The newly formed groups are also represented on the site, with information and reports coming from Switzerland, Austria, Italy, Australia, Canada, and the United States.
Later, we also established an e-mail listserv,3 with participants from many more countries. Discussions on the listserve range far and wide: sharing joys, sorrows, and liturgical experiences of baptisms and weddings that celebrate the two traditions; discussing understandings and implications of canon law and its application; discussing the most recent significant statement, One Bread, One Body, published by the bishops' conferences of England, Ireland, and Wales4; and planning for the next international conference in Edmonton, Canada, in 2001.5 What began as a way for us to keep in touch with interchurch families has become a labor of love and a source of nourishment for ourselves and others throughout the world.
In the words of the British Association of Interchurch Families,
We are couples in which the partners are members of different churches. We have committed ourselves to one another in Christian marriage. Because we belong to different churches, our married unity in Christ has to be expressed within those divided churches. It may be, therefore, that our experience of growing together will be useful to our churches at this stage.6
We believe we bring to the churches a model that contains elements without which the churches cannot move forward in their quest for the unity for which Christ so ardently prayed (cf. Jn 17:20-23).
************************************
The presence of interchurch families elicits a wide range of reactions in church members. Sometimes faith communities are a source of welcome and a gift of encouragement and energy. Others give rise to an implicit and strongly felt sense of unwelcome. Although the occurrences are rare, interchurch families sometimes face the shunning of the "non-member" spouse, or worse, of the whole family unit. There may also be a presumption (even pressure) that the non-Catholic spouse will "convert," with the alternative of being an interchurch family simply not seen as an option.
***********************************
Personal Reflections
We may know, intellectually and theologically, that a person is our brother or sister in Christ by virtue of his or her baptism and that our unity is further enhanced through the sacrament of marriage. Yet our reaction—personally, parochially, and ecclesially—is to throw up barriers (especially around our most central symbol, the Lord's table) not only to protect our values, but to prevent that person from impacting upon our safe and secure religious lives. A recent incident in our Catholic parish may serve as an example. A visiting priest was celebrating the Mass in the pastor's absence. A non-Catholic spouse approached him and explained that her parish was in an "interim" for some six months, so eucharist was not available. Would she be welcome at the Lord's table? "Yes," he replied. "We can do that now." When she went to receive the cup, the eucharistic minister was clearly uncomfortable about giving it. This spouse spoke to the eucharistic minister afterward, saying she was sorry for putting the woman on the spot, but that she had asked the priest and received permission. The woman's response was, "You know the rules. You can't just come in here and make up new rules as you go to suit yourself. I'm talking to Father about this." We have discovered, through discussions with many other interchurch families around the world, that such a situation, while painful, is by no means unique.
***********************************
We are, in fact, not truly separated because we remain bound in a common baptism. Over the centuries, however, we have become so estranged from our brothers and sisters in Christ that we now relegate them to the status of "unclean," unless they are willing to change religious affiliation and become "one of us." And yet they come, these "strange" brothers and sisters, not in anger at our estrangement but in the love that informs their marriages. They come, often willing to share faith, energy, and gifts. They come, and as their presence is felt, we enter into chaos, the radical breakdown of the order that we feel. This chaos is not of anyone's conscious making. Rather, it is the consequence of our inability to enter into dialogue with our "kin," to love them and trust them to love us. The chaos is a consequence of our being unable or unwilling to share our common stories and symbols, especially our central symbol of eucharist. Our response is to expect them to convert to our way of thinking.
**********************************
Of those spouses who decide to become a member of their spouse's church, those who remain in that church may be indifferent about their decision (38.3 percent). Over half, however, will experience a modest to strong sense of grief or loss, even opposition. We need to be sensitive to those feelings and, should the spouse be joining "our" tradition, make sure our joy bears no hint of triumph. For that reason, the reception of a non-Catholic into the Catholic community is better conducted at a time other than the Easter liturgy, which is itself more appropriate as a festive celebration of coming to faith in Christ.
**********************************
Pastors need to respect and focus on the lived reality, calling interchurch couples to the demanding but rich and rewarding task of discerning for themselves how those sound guiding words are to be applied within their marriages. Pastors and the churches must be prepared to walk with the family in that task and to respect their decisions. In the process, their domestic church will be nourished and strengthened and will bear fruit in faith.
***********************************
The Church teaches that reception of eucharist by a non-Catholic is possible, though only by way of exception. The Second Vatican Council's Decree on Ecumenism indicates that there are concrete, particular, and personal cases where common worship may not only be allowed but even commended (no. 8). Nevertheless, the experience of interchurch families around the world is that their practical circumstances do not suggest opportunities for eucharistic sharing. A number of factors militate against exploring this. Perhaps the greatest is that its exploration requires time. Four conditions must apply before the sacraments may be administered to a baptized person of another tradition: (1) the person must be unable to have recourse to a minister of his or her own church or ecclesial community for the sacrament desired; (2) the person must ask for the sacrament of his or her own initiative; (3) the person must manifest Catholic faith in the sacrament; and (4) the person must be properly disposed (DAPNE, 131). There must also be a situation of grave need.
**********************************
It takes time to discern the presence of those four conditions and of grave need. Equally important is that people need to be trusted in the decisions that flow from such discernment. Instead, they are required to ask permission, either of the parish priest or of the bishop. Our experience, like that of interchurch families around the world, repeatedly shows that the level of awareness of our pastoral needs tends to be low at best and often requires education of the clergy as part of the process of asking permission. Additionally, the non-Catholic must first come to grips with what is a comparatively large Church—complete with its own organizational structure, language, rituals, and law—before coming to know that permission must be asked, from whom, and how. The task is daunting in its complexity. Asking permission for something that is already deep in our hearts becomes more of a restrictive experience than a liberating one. The result is a marked tendency not to ask permission, but to live instead with a profound sense of pain.
Mark's Gospel tells us that in marriage we become "one flesh" (Mk 10:8). John's Gospel tells us that unless we "eat of the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood," we have no life in us (Jn 6:53). This "one" that God has created then wonders: where is this "one" to worship, to take and eat the body of Christ, to take and drink his blood? Deep pain causes us to cry out like an Old Testament prophet, "How long, O Lord, how long? How many more Sundays must that ‘one' whom you have joined together be separated?"
************************************
We invite the churches to consider their roles in the work of ecumenism. The churches have often been portrayed as parents of their children. When the child of one parent falls in love with and marries the child of another parent, both naturally desire the well-being of the son- or daughter-in-law, especially as it has an impact on the well-being of the son or daughter. This model is good, insofar as it shows a deep desire on the part of the "parents" to generate and nurture the faith lives of their children. Unfortunately, little in such a model brings the parents together, other than for the occasional social event.
We suggest that a more appropriate model is that of the children who commit themselves to a passionate relationship of love with each other. Having committed themselves to each other, they learn to live together and to share resources, material and spiritual. They worship together in each other's churches and find it especially important to be together at the eucharist. They discover in their marriages that unity does not mean uniformity and that differences can enrich their common life. We would go so far as to say that, were couples to approach marriage in the same manner as churches tend to approach ecumenism—where every i must be dotted and every t crossed before they can agree to come together—there would be few, if any, marriages.
The words of Rev. Canon Martin Reardon are most fitting:
When we compare the experience of a good marriage with the relationship between the churches, it raises questions. Where would our marriages be if we did not live together under the same roof; if we did not share all our goods and finances with one another; if we did not eat together day by day; if we did not share together in the education of our children? We are told that marriages where commitment, communication and cohesion are lacking are liable to end in divorce. We want to share our experience of all these wonderful things with our churches, because we fear that if our churches do not follow our example, the ecumenical movement could end in divorce.15
Regardless of how many episcopal statements are made indicating how the law separating the Catholic and non-Catholic should be observed, perhaps even despite our rich theology of baptism and marriage, these statements must not be restrictive or take precedence over the values of baptismal and marital unity and of the centrality of the domestic church. Nor will episcopal statements elaborating on the wonderful wisdom, openness, and compassion (such as the DAPNE) resolve these deeply embedded problems—though such statements would help greatly. They would help Catholics understand their own faith and its possibilities, and make non-Catholics feel more welcome, heard, and understood within the Catholic community to which they have become inextricably linked by virtue of their baptism and their marriage. The only way these issues will be resolved is to begin to trust, to join in dialogue with, to listen to stories from, and to share symbols with each other. Through this, we may together come to a place where we can recognize and celebrate the gifts each brings to the family.§
Ray and Fenella Temmerman are a Catholic and Anglican interchurch couple living in Canada. Members of the Canadian Association of Interchurch Families, they are active in ecumenical endeavors, including operating a website and e-mail listserv for the association.
- Interchurch Families, a journal of the Association of Interchurch Families of England, is published twice a year. It discusses the theological and pastoral issues raised by the existence of interchurch families. It is available from the Association of Interchurch Families, Inter-Church House, 35-41 Lower Marsh, London, SE1 7RL, England.
- www.aifw.org/aif/index.htm.
- aifw@iList.net with subscription information available at www.aifw.org/ aif/caif/listserv.htm.
- Catholic Bishops' Conferences of England and Wales, Ireland, and Scotland, One Bread, One Body (London and Dublin: Catholic Truth Society and Veritas Publications, 1998). See the review of this document by Richard E. McCarron in The Living Light 36:1 (1999): 84-85.
- The conference is planned for August 2-6, 2001. Information is available at www.aifw.org/aif/confer/caif/edmonton.htm.
- Cf. Association of Interchurch Families, "Churches Together in England," Interchurch Families 5:1 (January 1997). Cf. the Interchurch Families website at www.aifw.org/aif/journal/martin.htm.
- John Paul II, in an address to interchurch families, York, England, 1982.
- Unless otherwise indicated, all statistics are taken from Center for Marriage and Family, Creighton University, Ministry to Interchurch Families: A National Study (Omaha, Neb.: Center for Marriage and Family, 1999), 139.
- Ibid., 4.
- For more information, contact the American Association of Interchurch Families, c/o Michael & Barbara Slater, 14851 Harper St., Midway City, CA 92655-1382; phone: (714) 893-6482; e-mail: slaterbm@aol.com; website: www.aifw.org/aif/aaif/index.htm.
- Cf. Fr. Gerald Arbuckle, Earthing the Gospel: An Inculturation Handbook for Pastoral Workers (Maryknoll, N.Y.: Orbis, 1990) and Refounding the Church: Dissent for Leadership (Maryknoll, N.Y.: Orbis, 1993).
- G. H. Tavard, "Reassessing the Reformation," One in Christ 19 (1983): 360-361.
- The adapted RCIA acquired the force of law for the dioceses of the United States on September 1, 1988, and has since been the only adult initiation ritual that may be used licitly in the Latin rite territories of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops.
- Southern African Bishops' Conference, Directory On Ecumenism for Southern Africa, 6.3.4, January 1998.
- Rev. Canon Martin Reardon is a priest of the Anglican church in England and is married to a Catholic. He spoke at the International Conference of the Association of Interchurch Families, held in Geneva in 1998. The full text of his address can be found on the Association of Interchurch Families website, www.aifw.org/aif/confer/geneva/martingb.
Additional Bibliographic Resources
On the Interchurch Families website, you will find two excellent sets of bibliographic references provided by list service members.
- www.aifw.org/aif/resource/biblio.html is by Dr. Michael Lawler, director of the Center for Marriage and Family, Creighton University, Omaha, Neb.
- www.aifw.org/aif/resource/biblio2.htm is by Amy Jill Strickland, J.C.L., doctoral candidate, canon law, Leuven, Belgium.
Planning Interfaith Weddings
[This article, Planning Interfaith Weddings
by Gordon Truitt, is from The Living Light Spring 2000, Vol. 36, No. 3. Subscribe to The Living Light.]
Despite the long-standing preference of the Church—based on its view of marriage as a sacrament—that Catholic should marry Catholic (or, at least, another baptized person), interfaith marriage (marriage between a Catholic and an unbaptized person) has become an increasingly common phenomenon in many parts of the United States.
**********************************
Our ecumenical and interfaith goodwill in such matters for the past thirty years cannot be doubted. Our openness to other rituals, however, has caused a problem for many members of the Roman Catholic Church. On the surface, full use of the options provided in the rite would leave little in the ritual to engage the Catholics who are gathered for such a wedding in prayer. Beneath the surface, however, there are opportunities to retrieve elements of our ritual practice and to incorporate them into weddings in such a way that Catholics will have some sense of being at home in the rite, while participants from other traditions will continue to recognize the welcoming embrace that our marriage ritual offers to them.
*********************************
Catholic-Jewish Weddings: People of the Book
Islam has long identified the core tradition that Christians and Jews hold in common, calling us both "people of the Book" (see the Koran, Sura 98). In fact, we Christians have "borrowed" most of our Scriptures from the Jewish tradition, though we rarely acknowledge this loan in public. Some Jews accept Jesus as a rabbi in the Pharisee tradition, though they are certainly uncomfortable with Christian claims about his divinity and with what Christians have done in the past with his teaching. In Catholic-Jewish weddings, therefore, it should be possible to share one or even two readings from the Scriptures: one from the Old Testament or Tanakh, and one from the New Testament. Care should be taken in selecting these readings, of course, so that sensitive issues and texts are avoided; but in any proclamation of the Scriptures, Catholics would certainly recognize the basic elements of the liturgy of the word.
**********************************
Other elements of traditional Catholic weddings, however, are also part of Jewish custom. These include the veiling of the bride, especially if she is Orthodox, and a solemn procession. Local custom often determines the order of the procession in Jewish ceremonies, but Orthodox and Conservative traditions usually include the groom and both sets of parents as well as the bride, an order that is recommended in the Catholic ritual as well. The exchange of rings is also part of a Jewish marriage, though in some traditions the groom places the bride's ring on her right index finger instead of her left ring finger. Blessing of the marriage is also a practice shared by both traditions. The Catholic witness (priest or deacon) may want to consider chanting the blessing, since the seven blessings of a Jewish wedding are chanted by the hazzan (cantor) or rabbi.
Catholic-Muslim Weddings: There Is One God!
Increasingly, Catholics in the United States are meeting Muslims, and marriage occasionally follows such encounters. Since Muslim women are more strictly required to marry Muslim men than Muslim men are required to marry Muslim women, a marriage involving a Catholic will more likely involve a woman who is Catholic. . . . Still, it should be possible to celebrate a wedding that represents both traditions. One aspect of the planning to keep in mind is Islam's ambiguous attitude toward Christianity. While the Koran considers Christians deluded about the nature of Jesus of Nazareth, it treats Christians as at least potential believers, calling them people of faith as long as they "serve Allah and worship none but Him, attend to their prayers, and pay the alms-tax" (Koran, Sura 98).
***********************************
Catholic elements that may be recognized and accepted in a shared Catholic-Muslim ceremony, therefore, would include the questions and declaration of marriage, the ring (presented as a symbolic gift from the groom to the bride), and the declaration of marriage: "What God has joined, [people] must not divide." Muslims may be comfortable with readings from the Scriptures; but again, care should be taken in selecting the readings, since Muslims as well as Jews have strong disagreements with Christians over the nature of Jesus.
************************************
Catholic-Hindu Weddings: An Auspicious Time
Members of parish staffs grow tired of the phone calls that begin, "We've booked a hall for our reception on such-and-such a date because Great Aunt Maude and Uncle Harry can be in town that weekend. Can we schedule our wedding for that day?" Requests for weddings at "auspicious times," while often annoying, actually suggest a point of convergence between Catholic and Hindu weddings. One of the most important parts of a Hindu wedding is the choice of an auspicious time and date for the marriage ceremony, usually chosen with the help of astrological charts. Catholics who are seriously attuned to the church year (and to the ritual legislation) might similarly consult an ordo—instead of the stars—to discern whether or not a planned ceremony would fall in a less auspicious season for weddings, such as Lent. Still, working out a joint ceremony when a Catholic marries a Hindu may be very difficult; and Catholics may feel particularly uncomfortable at such ceremonies, especially since Hindus would treat even the quietest and most understated wedding as more of a community party than a serious and solemn ritual.
Still, certain ritual practices could forge some common ground and serve as the basis for a ceremony that respects both traditions. In addition to the selection of an appropriate time for the wedding, Catholic and Hindu rituals incorporate, in different ways, the use of processions, the offering of the bride by the father (or the parents), the use of flowers, and prayers for God's blessing. When a Catholic marries a Sikh (Sikhism is an offshoot of Hinduism that developed in Northern India in the early sixteenth century), the following ritual elements are worth examining in the search for common ground: the bride is dressed in elaborate clothing; the bride's mother and best friend (maid of honor) escort the bride to her seat; there are readings from the Sikh scriptures by a pathi (reader); promises are exchanged; and there is a procession around the holy book.
It's Possible
Clearly, the farther one gets from the Scriptures and the ritual elements shared by Catholics and Jews, the harder it becomes to incorporate Catholic marriage practices with the practices of other traditions. Still, careful attention to both traditions and an exploration of common elements might make it possible for Catholics to feel that they have participated in a ritual with significant Catholic elements while still respecting the rituals of the non-Catholic.§
Gordon E. Truitt holds a doctorate in sacred theology from The Catholic University of America (1982). He has worked for more than thirty years in the field of pastoral liturgy. Currently, he edits Pastoral Music and other publications for the National Association of Pastoral Musicians in Washington, D.C.
- The second typical edition of the marriage rite (Ordo Celebrandi Matrimonium) has not yet appeared in an English or Spanish translation for use in the United States, but the Latin text extends the possible changes even further, omitting (as the 1969 rite did not) an invocation of the Trinity at the blessing of rings.
Printed Resources
- Joan C. Hawxhurst, ed., Interfaith Wedding Ceremonies: Samples and Sources (Kalamazoo, Mich.: Dovetail Publishing, 1997). This practical resource for Jewish-Christian weddings, written by a practicing United Methodist married to a practicing Jew, contains sample ceremonies, including one officiated by a priest and a Jewish scholar and another with a priest and a rabbi.
- Abraham Klausner, Weddings: A Complete Guide to All Religious and Interfaith Marriage Services(Columbus, Ohio: Alpha Publishing, 1986). While more comprehensive than the Hawxhurst text, this book is almost ten years older and is currently out of print.
- Devon A. Lerner, Celebrating Interfaith Marriages: Creating Your Jewish/Christian Ceremony (New York: Owl Books, 1999). Written by a rabbi, this book also includes sample ceremonies between Jewish and Christian partners as well as practical suggestions.
- Swidler, Arlene Anderson, ed., Marriage among the Religions of the World, Religions in Dialogue, vol. 2 (Toronto: Edwin Mellen Press, 1990). A scholarly survey, this work could provide valuable background information.
Websites
- The Dovetail Publishing site lists books about interfaith weddings: www.mich.com/~dovetail/IWC.html.
- A site with a help section entitled "Help, I'm a wedding guest" is offered at www.weddingbells.com. It also offers brief explanations of ceremonies in various traditions.
- The Wedding Central Book and Music Store includes bibliographies of books about interfaith weddings and recorded collections of wedding music (though most of the music is not helpful for interfaith weddings involving Catholics): www.weddingcentral.com.
>Forgiveness and Reconciliation
in Marriage
(This article, Forgiveness and Reconciliation in Marriage by Mario Barbero, is taken from The Living Light Spring 2000, Vol. 36, No. 3. Subscribe to The Living Light.]
...I have always found it significant that the longest section of the Gospel of Matthew in the so-called "discourse on church order" (Mt 18) presents Jesus' teaching on the Church as centering on forgiveness. There Jesus answers Peter's question, "Lord, if my brother sins against me, how often must I forgive him?" (Mt 18:21-35).
It is not just in the sacrament of penance that the Church's liturgy witnesses to the importance of forgiveness. The celebration of the eucharist opens with the penitential rite in which each participant in the liturgy confesses his or her sins. During the eucharistic prayer, the words of Jesus over the cup are repeated: "This is the cup of my blood, which will be shed . . . so that sins may be forgiven." In preparation for communion, the assembly prays the Our Father, asking God to "forgive our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us." The Church, in fact, is a community of those who have been reconciled in Christ and whose sins have been forgiven. The spirit and reality of the eucharistic community, which witnesses to Christ's love, can be seen within the framework of the sacrament of marriage. The biblical exhortation "do not let the sun set on your anger" (Eph 4:26) is particularly meaningful when addressed to a married couple: Can one sleep peacefully and joyfully with one's angry enemy? Is it possible to live together without hurting each other? A successful marriage is one in which the partners learn how to forgive each other; and when this happens, the couple experiences the grace of healing. This grace radiates to their children and creates an atmosphere of acceptance and cooperation. To live the vocation of a true Christian marriage, the couple needs to be formed and continually supported by an ongoing living community.
By their marriage vows, couples commit themselves to be true to each other "in good times and in bad." It is an accepted tenet that being a loving couple for life is not easy. Different personalities, backgrounds, family histories, approaches to life, needs, interests, and values need to be worked out with patience and understanding. The key to having patience and reaching understanding is for the couple to forgive each other daily. It takes a tremendous amount of time and continuous work. "The two will become one flesh" (Eph 5:31) is an exciting and demanding call for the married couple—a call that can be lived only with daily commitment. On this road to unity there are daily conflicts. People hurt each other.
Making Good Marriages Better
The experience of a Marriage Encounter weekend is a powerful tool whereby the Christian community helps couples become aware of the grace of their sacrament and discover, in a deeper way, the grace of their married life. Marriage Encounter (ME) was started in Spain by Fr. Gabriel Calvo in the early 1960s, and it spread later to Latin America, North America, and then all the continents. During a ME weekend, three couples and a priest share their experience of married life. Participants are asked to talk with their partner, discussing the various aspects of their married life using a method taught to them over the weekend. This intense "course in communication" often has an amazing impact on the lives of the couples, in many cases bringing about healing and reconciliation where before there was pain and remorse.
***********************************
Healing Troubled Marriages
The normal ME weekend aims to make good marriages better. But so-called "troubled marriages" need a different approach. This is why ME developed Retrouvaille (Rediscovery), a special program for troubled marriages. Started in Quebec in 1977, Retrouvaille offers an intense weekend format along with a three-month follow-up program that extends the experience of the weekend and helps couples permanently incorporate the skills they learned into the day-to-day struggle in their marriage relationship. Retrouvaille has spread throughout the United States and is also active in some Latin American, European, and African countries.
The success of Retrouvaille is an encouraging sign that reconciliation and forgiveness are possible. The couples attending the program usually are suffering from a communications breakdown and are, at times, at the point of contemplating separation or are already either separated or divorced yet wish to try again. The method of the Retrouvaille weekend is similar to the ME weekend, but the presentations place more emphasis on themes of self-knowledge, acceptance of self, acceptance of differences, and trust and forgiveness. After each presentation, the individuals are given a question to write about and then to share with their partners. This simple but effective technique of writing to each other allows partners space to express themselves without interruption and to share important feelings more clearly. At no time during the weekend do partners share with other couples their individual problems or issues.
**********************************
The priest who presents the Retrouvaille weekend has the role of minister of forgiveness and healing. His presentations emphasize the meaning of love in marriage, how hurt and pain make people self-centered, and how hurt and pain can also prevent people from trusting again. The priest encourages the couples to break the chain of self-pity and resentment by changing the focus from themselves to their partners. This change of focus helps overcome the desire for revenge and opens one to forgiveness. Forgiveness can be described as "giving up my right to hurt you because you have hurt me."
**********************************
A powerful moment during the weekend is when the priest asks for forgiveness for the hurts caused by the Church. Some of the participants, in fact, carry deep resentment resulting from hurts they received from some members of the Church. This asking for forgiveness fits very well with the spirit of the Jubilee Year 2000, following the example of Pope John Paul II, who has already asked for forgiveness for many of the sins of the church community.
After the Retrouvaille weekend is completed, the couples are asked to attend twelve post-weekend sessions, during which the main topics of the weekend are reinforced with the help of other Retrouvaille couples. During these sessions the ups and downs of a healing relationship are shared and discussed. Finally, after this post-weekend follow-up period, the couples are invited to be part of a support group called CORE (Continuing Our Retrouvaille Experience), an ongoing support group for couples in the program. The journey of forgiveness needs the understanding companionship of others as well as faith support.§
Mario Barbero, IMC, a missionary in Kenya for twenty-one years, now serves on the National Secretariat of Marriage Encounter in the United States and for the past five years has worked with Retrouvaille.
Resources for Family Peacemaking
(This excerpt is from the article Resources for Family Peacemaking, The Living Light Spring 2000, Vol. 36, No. 3. Subscribe to The Living Light.]
Why is it important that families be helped to be peacemakers? In their 1983 landmark pastoral letter The Challenge of Peace: God's Promise and Our Response, the U.S. Catholic bishops stated that "peacemaking is not an optional commitment. It is a requirement of our faith. We are called to be peacemakers, not by some movement of the moment, but by our Lord Jesus" (no. 333). Having thus challenged all Catholics, the bishops then affirmed the critical role of families and challenged them more specifically: "Your role, in our eyes, is unsurpassed by any other; the foundation of society is the family. We are conscious of the continuing sacrifices you make in the efforts to nurture the full human and spiritual growth of your children. Children hear the gospel message first from your lips. Parents who consciously discuss issues of justice in the home and who strive to help children solve conflicts through non-violent methods enable their children to grow up as peacemakers" (The Challenge of Peace, no. 306). Eleven years later, in their 1994 document Confronting a Culture of Violence: A Catholic Framework for Action, the bishops applied this call for peacemaking more explicitly to interpersonal, institutional, and cultural violence, and they continued to emphasize that a peacemaking ministry in the midst of a culture of violence is a family affair.
What can families do to teach their children peacemaking values and skills? In no. 306 of The Challenge of Peace, the bishops identify four ways that families can teach and practice peacemaking.
- "Nurture the full human and spiritual growth of your children."
- "Children hear the gospel message first from your lips."
- "Consciously discuss issues of justice in the home."
- "Help children solve conflicts through non-violent methods."
This final directive from the bishops may be the most critical task facing parents today. Families have a unique opportunity and resource to help them face this task in the Families Against Violence Advocacy Network's "Family Pledge of Nonviolence." This tool for family peacemaking begins by promoting respect and nonviolent problem-solving skills. It teaches families how to use family meetings for planning family activities and solving family conflicts. The pledge also promotes family reconciliation and encourages nonviolent play. It offers many ways to care for nature and to face the violence and injustice so prevalent in our society. The Families Against Violence Advocacy Network also created adaptations of the pledge for schools, classrooms, youth groups, and parishes. These adaptations link families, parishes, and entire communities in a national effort to challenge the culture of violence and to promote more peaceful families and communities.
What are some examples of "success stories" in family peacemaking? While millions of ordinary families continue to work at peacemaking within their own homes, few families are featured in books or articles. But some wonderful examples are among those whose stories have been told.
In the early 1970s, Bob and Janet Aldridge and their ten children gave up a large income from Bob's job as a missile designer for Lockheed Aircraft to pursue a life of peacemaking. Their book Children and Nonviolence (Pasadena, Calif.: Hope Publishing House, 1987) is both challenging and hopeful to other families. Jackie Haessly and Dan Didomizio and their multi-racial family have been a source of inspiration for thousands who have read their book Learning to Live Together at Home and in the World (San Jose, Calif.: Resource Publications, 1988) or who have attended one of Jackie's workshops on family peacemaking.
Mary Joan and Jerry Park have dedicated their lives to family peacemaking through their own "mom and pop" operation called Little Friends for Peace. Their family workshops and peace camps have touched children and families both in inner-city Washington, D.C., and throughout the country. Much of their family program is available in Families Caring (St. Louis, Mo.: Institute for Peace and Justice, 1995). Ken and Gretchen Lovingood and their large adopted family have been an inspiration to families not only through the African American expression of Marriage Encounter and the Black Catholic Congress, but also through their many books on family life. Their vision and practical examples are also available in Families Creating a Circle of Peace, which is available from the Institute for Peace and Justice. Perhaps the most inspirational family peacemaking success story is that of Ruth Nelson and the four generations of Nelsons who are celebrated in a prophetic and moving video entitled Mother of the Year (available as a rental from the Institute for Peace and Justice). Ruth's perspective as a grandmother is delightful reading for all ages and walks of life. One of our favorites is God's Joy in My Heart (Philadelphia, Penn.: Augsburg Press, 1980).§
James and Kathleen McGinnis direct the Institute for Peace and Justice in St. Louis, Mo. They are the authors of Parenting for Peace and Justice: Ten Years Later (Maryknoll, N.Y.: Orbis Books, 1990) and contributors to A Call to Peace: 52 Meditations on the Family Pledge of Nonviolence. Information on the Institute may be obtained at www.ipj-ppj.org.
|